[ad_1]
GP located on the arrowhead plateau of ‘DMZ Peace Road’ in Cheorwon-gun, Gangwon-do. [매경DB] At the time of the North Korean Army (GP) shooting, it took more than 30 minutes to respond to the Republic of Korea’s response, and it turned out that the fire was the cause of the fire. It is likely to be noted if there was a problem with the Korean Army’s vanguard response. Furthermore, it was revealed that the four shots from North Korea hit the outer wall of the observatory where our soldiers worked and formed an impact force of 1.5 ~ 2m. Military authorities remained in the “accidental case,” but the controversy over the low-key response to North Korea is likely to continue. Previously, the military authorities raised suspicions by not revealing details for reasons of investigation by UNCMAC.
According to the joint report on the 13th, after an attack on the North Korean army at the time, the K-6 machine gun attempted an immediate response with a remote firing system, but did not work due to a malfunction, so it became in a manual answer. The army did not explain the specific situation after the incident, and after various suspicions arose, it began to explain later, but left the controversy over the intention of North Korea’s shooting and the handling of front-line weapons. According to the joint description, on Day 3, the North Korean Army found a trace of the shooting and attempted to fire a response with a remote firing system, but when it failed, the regiment ordered a K-3 machine gun to fire, and the GP fired 15 shots at the North Korean GP. It was 22 minutes after discovering the traces of the North Korean gunshots and 32 minutes after hearing the first impact.
Military officials said the North Korean shooting was accidental during the briefing. A joint official said, “Our army fired, but there was no response from the North Korean army, and at that time, North Korean GP personnel were not wearing a helmet.” “The military has understood that the shooting in North Korea was accidental, but it cannot be made public,” he said.
According to the alliance, GP workers were ready for battle in 5 minutes after being shot at 7:41 a.m. The battalion commander, who was on his way to work, was briefed by phone and instructed to shoot a North Korean surveillance post at 7:56. At 8:01, she attempted to fire with a K-6 heavy machine gun equipped with a remote firing system, but was not fired. The assistant gunman went directly to the firearms area and inspected the firearms, but in the end he was not activated. On the 13th, military authorities confirmed that the K-6 remote firing system had been broken through a briefing, and confirmed that the ball from the machine gun (the iron bar that caused the explosion by hitting the detonator) exploded. .
At that time, the regiment, observing the situation on the screen, ordered him to fire with a K-3 light machine gun (5.56mm caliber) and fired 15 shots at the North Korean surveillance post at 8:13. When it was pointed out that the battalion commander and the battalion commander, not the first GP, who was beaten, violated the principle of “report after preliminary measures,” the joint leader said: In principle, it should be stated. ” He added that the GP was unable to issue a direct fire command because the origin of the bullet was not confirmed at that time.
After 15 shots fired with a K-3 machine gun, the division commander explained the principle of proportionality to direct additional K-6 shots. As a result of finding and confirming a nuclear warhead that the GP chief fell to the ground, the North Korean Army displayed a 14.5mm anti-aircraft gun, and the division commander ordered a North Korean anti-aircraft gun and similar K-6 manual fire (caliber 12.7 mm). Fired car
“Because North Korean troops attacked our GP, we also aimed and shot,” Hapcham explained. Military authorities, who had judged the North Korean shooting as an “accidental situation,” emphasized that there was no change in this position, but claimed that they had also obtained information about the military situation in North Korea. However, it is noted that the possibility of intentional provocation cannot be ruled out because the four shots from the North Korean army formed an impact force on the outer wall of our GP. Regarding the ‘Theory of Military Consensus Dance Theory 19/19’ issue, Ministry of National Defense officials said: “The North Korean military shooting is a clear violation of the inter-Korean military union, but military stability has improved over the last year and 8 months. ”
[박만원 기자][ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
