[ad_1]
What is ‘victim-like’ and ‘perpetrator-like’
Representative Chang said, “No matter how painful it was, I digested the program, attended the discussion meetings, and chaired the meeting. People did not notice my damage ”, he emphasized,“ there is no fixed appearance of the victim ”. This is a frontal refutation of the “second abuse” questions many victims of sexual violence face, including “Why didn’t you report it immediately” and “how your daily life was possible despite the damage,” including Kim Ji – eun, who revealed that she had been raped by former Chungnam Governor Ahn Hee-jung. Furthermore, Representative Chang also pointed to the illusion of ‘perpetrator’. “The person who commits sexual violence is not determined,” said Representative Jang. “The moment someone does not treat their fellow citizens as equally worthy people, they can become perpetrators of sexual violence.” “No matter how well you have lived before or are respected by many people, there are no exceptions.” Kim Jong-cheol, the leader of the party that has called out for the eradication of gender-based violence, also pointed to the reality of becoming a criminal. It is also a reminder of the behavior of some members of the Democratic Party and their supporters, who previously argued that the late Mayor Park Won-soon was sued for sexual harassment. In a place where there is no “victim” or “perpetrator,” Rep. Chang posed a difficult question. Representative Jang said, “Why do even men who lead such lives fail so miserably to treat the woman in front of her as worthy?” “We must face this question. And you must find the answer. ”
“What is more terrible than the second offense is losing me”
Representative Jang confessed that he was also afraid of secondary abuse and that he feared the impact of his testimony. He said: “I am very afraid of the unreasonable secondary harm that will come to me by revealing the facts of the harm,” he said. “But what is more terrible than that is losing myself. If I live with the hidden facts forever by separating myself as a victim and as a member of the National Assembly to protect the victims, I will be confined to this case forever. He emphasized the wishes of many victims, “recovery to daily life.” “I want to talk about my suffering and be truly free from this problem,” he wrote. “I want to go back to my daily life of politics.”
What ‘differences’ should the Justice Party show?
Representative Jang said, “Even if the perpetrator is the party representative, or rather, because he is the party representative, there was a belief that the Justice Party would deal with the case with a firm and tolerant attitude.” In this regard, experts say that it is necessary to be attentive to the ‘faith in the community’ that made the #MeToo possible by Jang. Kim Hyun-young, a women’s studies researcher, said in a phone call with “Victims believed that the organization would respond to them, and the Justice Party fortunately responded responsibly.” It was a great defeat to expel them from the community. Representative Jang clearly showed that this incident could allow the ‘victim within us’ to speak of harm. The Justice Party must find its own differentiation there ”. By Lee Ji-hye, Staff Reporter [email protected]
[ad_2]
