[ad_1]
The Democratic Party launches TF and begins to specify the ‘distribution of benefits’
Platform companies identified as the main objectives of the profit sharing system
If companies participate in the fund, benefits such as corporate tax cuts are expected
[앵커]
To resolve the polarization caused by the Corona 19 crisis, the Democratic Party has begun working to materialize the profit-sharing system proposed by Lee Nak-yeon. The key is to induce the voluntary participation of companies, but one side opposes it because it is unconstitutional and the other is unrealistic. Reporter Kim Dae-geun reports. Additionally, the Democratic Party has launched the ‘Post Corona Inequality Relief TF’ and started work on a profit sharing system. The profit sharing system consists of sharing the profits of some industries augmented by Corona 19 with difficult small companies. Representative Lee Nak-yeon emphasized the principle that the private sector participates voluntarily and the party and government support but do not interfere. Platform companies whose profits have increased due to non-face-to-face transactions such as Naver, Kakao and People of Delivery are the main targets of the profit sharing system. If they voluntarily create funds or lower fees for small business owners, the government is expected to provide incentives, such as lower corporate taxes. The possibility of legally securing benefits for participating companies will also be discussed. The force of the people is unconstitutional and clarified the opposite position. It is the idea of transferring the work of the government to the people. The Justice Party opposes the profit-sharing system on the other side. He said that voluntary participation in itself was too sentimental and irresponsible, and urged them to apply for additional taxes. Similar questions are being raised within the Democratic Party and the Justice Party. As the reality of voluntary participation is poor and controversy over the control of donations can arise, some argue that the use of systems such as the wealth tax or the social solidarity tax, or the realization of social contributions to sectors with increase sales required by law. After all, the key to the political controversy over the profit-sharing system is whether voluntary participation is possible. The appearance of the workshop is also expected to change depending on the specific form of the profit-sharing system of CEO Nak-yeon Lee, who recently devoted himself to troubling topics. YTN Kim Dae-geun[[email protected]]is.
