[정치]Nakyeonpyo Lee’s ‘Profit Distribution System’ Seriously … Voluntary Participation Controversy



[ad_1]

[앵커]

To resolve the polarization caused by the Corona 19 crisis, the Democratic Party has begun working to materialize the profit-sharing system proposed by Lee Nak-yeon.

The key is to induce the voluntary participation of companies, but one side opposes it because it is unconstitutional and the other is unrealistic.

Reporter Kim Dae-geun reports.

[기자]

Additionally, the Democratic Party has launched the ‘Post Corona Inequality Relief TF’ and started work on a profit sharing system.

The profit sharing system consists of sharing the profits of some industries augmented by Corona 19 with difficult small companies.

Representative Lee Nak-yeon emphasized the principle that the private sector participates voluntarily and the party and government support but do not interfere.

[이낙연 / 더불어민주당 대표 : 민간의 자발적 참여로 추진되는 것을 원칙으로 했으면 합니다. 당과 정부는 후원자 역할에 집중해야 합니다.]

Platform companies whose profits have increased due to non-face-to-face transactions such as Naver, Kakao and People of Delivery are the main targets of the profit sharing system.

If they voluntarily create funds or lower fees for small business owners, the government is expected to provide incentives, such as lower corporate taxes.

The possibility of legally securing benefits for participating companies will also be discussed.

[홍익표 / 더불어민주당 정책위의장 : 필요하면 세제·금융 지원을 해야 하는데 그런 경우에는 당연히 필요한 법이 따라가야 하는 것 아니겠어요?]

The force of the people is unconstitutional and clarified the opposite position.

It is the idea of ​​transferring the work of the government to the people.

[주호영 / 국민의힘 원내대표 (어제) : 경제 주체의 팔을 비틀어서 이익까지도 환수해내겠다는 생각인 것 같습니다.]

The Justice Party opposes the profit-sharing system on the other side.

He said that voluntary participation in itself was too sentimental and irresponsible, and urged them to apply for additional taxes.

[장혜영 / 정의당 원내대변인 (어제) : 이낙연 더불어민주당 대표께 제안합니다. 오는 2월 국회에서 특별재난연대세 도입을 위한 입법을 전면적으로 논의합시다.]

Similar questions are being raised within the Democratic Party and the Justice Party.

As the reality of voluntary participation is poor and controversy over the control of donations can arise, some argue that the use of systems such as the wealth tax or the social solidarity tax, or the realization of social contributions to sectors with increase sales required by law.

After all, the key to the political controversy over the profit-sharing system is whether voluntary participation is possible.

The appearance of the workshop is also expected to change depending on the specific form of the profit-sharing system of CEO Nak-yeon Lee, who recently devoted himself to troubling topics.

YTN Kim Dae-geun[[email protected]]is.

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
[ad_2]