[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ On the morning of the 29th, Justice Minister Chu Miae announces the ‘Special New Year’s Amnesty 2021’ at the Seoul Government Complex. The Ministry of Justice announced that on the 31st of next year a total of 3,024 people will be held, including small and medium-sized entrepreneurs and owners of small businesses, criminals, prisoners of special consideration (negative) and instructors in social conflict. | |
| Ⓒ Photographic Cooperative Foundation |
See related photos |
Once again, the legal profession is being shaken by the issue of Justice Minister Chu Miae. This is because the Ministry of Justice and the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office took different positions on whether Minister Chu made his first official position on the corona19 infection situation in the East Seoul Detention Center, and whether the The prosecutor’s son was reinvestigating the military leave charges.
Chu Mi-ae “Crown spread in the eastern detention center, I am very sorry”
First, Minister Choo Mi-ae said on his Facebook page on the 1st: “As the Minister of Justice, who is in charge of correcting the spread of the crown at the East Seoul Detention Center, I am very sorry to have caused people concern. “
He said: “Infectious diseases like the crown first destroy the most vulnerable part of our society (omitted). In legal administration, the usual weak part will be revealed,” he said. “It is the overcrowding of the camps that is very fatal in the case of large-scale infectious diseases.”
He then explained the progress of the situation confirmed by corona19 in the Eastern Detention Center. First, Minister Chu said: “The East Seoul Detention Center conducted an inspection with an expert on December 25. It is presumed that the cause of the rapid group infection was a new prisoner who is mainly an asymptomatic infected person after the third pandemic “. However, he said, “before, after quarantining new prisoners for 14 days, we have been forced to comply with the marriage acceptance procedure,” he said. “However, even if a confirmed person has no symptoms, it will not leak, so the possibility of spread from this remains.”
He continued: “Experts advised me to separate confirmed and unconfirmed patients and reduce housing density to avoid further spread,” he said. “After designating the East Seoul Detention Center as a live treatment facility, it will be reorganized into a facility that accepts confirmed patients.” We plan to transfer undiagnosed individuals to other correctional institutions and separate them. “” We will extend probation. for exemplary prisoners and we will carry out follow-up work to lower prison density as soon as possible by simultaneously suspending executions, “he added.
In his article, Minister Chu emphasized that the detention center is a very vulnerable structure to infectious diseases due to the spatial and operational characteristics of the detention center, and that improvement is needed in the future. Unlike prisons, detention centers are not only the frequent entry and exit of new prisoners, but the East Seoul Detention Center is a high-rise building and has poor ventilation, making it very vulnerable to infectious diseases.
At the end of the article, he said: “As Minister of Justice, I will do everything possible to prevent the spread of the crown until the end of my term,” he said. “I worry one more time and I’m sorry.”
Reinvestigation of the Chancellor’s son? Contrary to the position of the Ministry of Justice and Seoul High School
 |
|
| ▲ Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae leaves the meeting room on the morning of the 29th after announcing the ‘Special New Year’s Amnesty 2021’ at the Seoul Government Complex. The Ministry of Justice announced that on the 31st of next year a total of 3,024 people will be held, including small and medium-sized businessmen and small businessmen, criminals, prisoners of special consideration (negative) and instructors in social conflict. | |
| Ⓒ Photographic Cooperative Foundation |
See related photos |
On the other hand, according to a written response from the Ministry of Justice released by the People’s Power Office in Kim Do-eup that day, it is known that the suspicion of Choo’s son’s military leave is being reinvested in the Seoul High Prosecutor’s Office. However, the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office denied this, saying: “We have not ordered a new investigation.”
The Justice Ministry explained in a written response to Kim Do-eup’s office, “The case is currently being investigated by the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office (Chief Prosecutor Park Cheol-woong).” He added: “It is difficult to respond to the specific name of the prosecutor in charge, whether the investigation data has been reviewed and the expected time to determine whether a new investigation should be initiated, etc., as there is concern that it may affect the ongoing investigation.
Earlier, the Office of Congressman Kim Do-eup told the Ministry of Justice: ‘The Seoul Higher Prosecutor’s Office assigned the case for the return of Minister Chu Mi-ae’s son, who appealed to the public power on October 27, and the name of the assigned prosecutor was assigned and whether the investigation data received from the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office was completed. ‘ We have asked the Ministry of Justice when it is expected to decide whether to initiate a new investigation.
However, the Seoul High School denied it. The Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office said in an official position on the day: “We are pleased to inform you that the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office has not ordered a new investigation or a new investigation (regarding the case of Minister Chu’s son).” .
The Seoul High District Prosecutor’s Office explained that “the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office has received a record of the complaint and is currently investigating the case, and the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office has not directly corrected the original case and ordered a reconsideration. “. To re-investigate directly, the case must be re-investigated by re-investigation or a re-investigation order must be issued to the Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office, but there have been no related procedures.
