[ad_1]
Public criticism of Professor Kim Won-soon Park’s victim letter
“What we are looking for is not ‘the honor of a person’, but the way to advance in the community”
Kim Min-woong, a professor at Kyung Hee University (Institute for Future Civilization), posted on his Facebook and then made it private.
Kyung Hee University students received the joint signature of a statement criticizing the release of the letter from the victim of suspected sexual harassment of the late Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon by Professor Min-woong Kim from Kyunghee University. to have. Jun-seo Lee and Yoon-seo Lee, who introduced themselves as Kyunghee University students who took Professor Kim’s class, said on the 27th, ‘Professor! And it issued a statement entitled ‘The secondary assault on victims of sexual violence should cease to exist.’ You are receiving a joint signature from Google Docs. On the 23rd, Professor Kim posted a letter written by the victim to Mayor Park on his Facebook page and exposed the victim’s real name. Suspicion of the victim’s agent for violating the Law of Punishment for Sexual ViolenceWas hit. Later, Professor Kim made the post private and later apologized saying, “I couldn’t hide my name, but I had no intention.” However, the ‘second damage’ is a reality, like the letters of the real name floating on the Internet and social networks. In a statement, the students criticized the revelation of Professor Kim’s letter under the false ‘victimhood’ premise that ‘sexual violence cannot occur in intimate relationships’. The students said, “Isn’t the purpose of revealing the letter” that sexual violence is not established in an intimate relationship “? The act of putting it on top of oneself is another form of secondary abuse.” Furthermore, the students said: “In the teacher’s class, we learned about ‘politics for humans’. It is not the ‘honor of a person’ that we have to look for now, and I think that what we have to do now is to discuss the right path for the community to take. “He then told Professor Kim:” It is not proven that it is not was a victim because he wrote a letter. Rather, sexual violence is more likely to occur in close relationships. He called for the regulation of victimization and secondary abuse to be stopped with the intent of being ‘letter disclosure.’ After the victim’s letter was released, some Mayor Park supporters continued the “second offense.” On the 26th, all eight people who worked at the Mayor Park election campaign camp, including the former Seoul media secretary Lee Dae-ho,Of those who supported Park Won-soon and opposed the second victim Entrance gateAnd he’s getting a sign of support. The following is the full text of the names of the Kyunghee University students
professor! Secondary harassment of victims of sexual violence should no longer occur.> Professor! The publication of the content of the letter itself is an act of “victim” determination. On the 23rd, the professor posted a meaningful word on his personal SNS on the 23rd, with the title ‘Handwritten Letter from Mayor Won-soon Park’ with the real name of the victim and the content of the letter, saying: “I await your judgment.” Acknowledging that it was a technical error to reveal the real name of the victim, he apologized, and the gap and contradiction between the ‘will of the victim to avoid sexual harassment for four years’ and the’ heart of Park Won-soon to write a letter to the former mayor of Seoul ‘is not understood. He stressed the intention to republish the content of the letter, saying that he wanted to seek a trial. I’m curious about the case of former Seoul Mayor Park Won-soon’s power-type sexual violence, what kind of expectations of citizens and what kind of judgment the professor made in the letter. Wasn’t the purpose of the letter public to say, “Because it is an intimate relationship, sexual violence cannot be established”? Another form of secondary offense in itself is the act of putting the victim on the basis of an assessment, not “the fact of sexual violence” simply because what is seen in the letter written by the victim was an intimate relationship with former mayor Park Won-soon. Not only revealing the real name, but intentionally publishing the content of the letter itself is an act of harming the victim. professor! Even in intimate relationships, sexual violence can occur. There is no ‘victim or wrongdoer’ in the professor’s apology. Professor Won-soon Park, the former mayor of Seoul City, has intentionally released the contents of the letter to prevent his honor from being lost because he has made “extraordinary efforts for women’s rights.” The contents are also written in the apology that the teacher himself wrote. However, as everyone knows, sexual violence is generally the result of an unbalanced power relationship between the perpetrator and the victim, and 80% of the harm from sexual violence comes from people you know, such as neighbors, relatives, friends and colleagues. Since writing an intimate letter does not mean that the victim is not a victim, publishing the content of the teacher’s letter is a rule of perfect victimization, contrary to the claim that the teacher’s apology is written, “ It is not determined that the victim be a victim. ” In recent years, we have faced numerous cases of sexual violence in the power of society. Victims were constantly forced to rise to the “standard of assessment” and each time they were forced to prove their worth as victims. A letter released by the professor along with the words of ‘seek the judgment of citizens’ again created such a situation. How long do victims of sexual violence in this society have to prove that they are victims? In recent years, we have all witnessed the damage caused by sexual violence by power and hierarchy in communities. However, with the discussion within the community still fading, the victim was asked to prove their ‘victim’ and responded by completely excluding the perpetrator from the community. It is questionable whether this is really the solution to solving the problem of sexual violence and preventing the recurrent harm of sexual violence. In his class, we learned about politics for humans. What we have to look for now is not “the honor of a person”, and I think what we have to do now is to discuss the correct path for the community to take. So I tell the teacher. First, the fact that you wrote the letter does not prove that you are not the victim. Rather, sexual violence is more likely to occur within intimate relationships. With those facts in mind, stop the regulation of victimization and secondary abuse that is intended to be a “disclosure by letter.” Second, intimate relationships, especially within the supervisor and subordinates, are frequently exposed to sexual violence. All of us facing the incident of power-type sexual violence in society must look back to the culture in the community, including the workplace. We ask that you join us on the journey to create such a community.
By Lim Jae-woo, Staff Reporter [email protected]
[ad_2]
