[ad_1]
 |
| © News1 |
On the 26th, a petition for the Blue House national petition calling for indictment by the first court of first instance, which sentenced Dongyang University professor Jeong Gyeong-shim to four years in prison, received more than 350,000 consents.
As of 4:32 pm the same day, a national petition saying ‘I request the indictment of the court of the first court of first instance of the political court’ has received a total of 353,4109 people.
The petition, which was submitted to the Casa Azul National Petition on the 23rd, exceeded the consent of 200,000 people, which is the standard by which the Casa Azul officially responds, on the 24th, which is a day after having exceeded 300,000. on the morning of the third day.
The petitioner published the petition immediately after being sentenced to Professor Jeong’s first trial. In the article, the petitioner pointed out to Judges Lim Jeong-yeop, Kwon Seong-su, and Kim Seon-hee of the Penal Agreement 25-2 of the Seoul Central District Court, which was the first trial of Professor Chung’s first trial, and said: “The three judges are asked to initiate an accusation process at the level of the National Assembly that represents the people.” I urge you, “he argued,” because three judges seriously violate Article 103 of the Constitution, which requires a judgment of conscience “.
The petitioner said: “The ‘focused judgment’ that the judges must judge the innocence of the defendant based on the defendant’s diary and the evidentiary record carried out in court is now known to ordinary people like me. He pointed out that if he judges only with the documents, it is an act of abandonment of the conscience of the judge and contrary to the constitution.
Subsequently, “the court of political and economic hearings unilaterally relied only on the circumstantial evidence and sworn statements of the prosecution, despite having conducted 34 trials, but the material evidence presented by the lawyer and the content that challenged the arguments of the accusation will be used as the basis for sentencing. “It is the prosecutor’s duty to prove the prosecution’s accusation, and if it does not do so perfectly, it ignores the ‘principle of presumption of innocence’ and showed a partial progression towards non-neutral prosecution in the process judicial “.
The petitioner said: “The nature of this case is a case in which the prosecutors acquired powers, resisted the reform, abused their right to investigation and prosecution, and made an unreasonable prosecution,” he said. At least 34 As one of the people who saw the trial process at the conference, I can never admit that the three judges made decisions in accordance with the constitution and legal conscience.
The petitioner said: “The National Assembly representing the people demands that these three judges, who have betrayed the judges’ conscience, initiate an indictment for impeachment as stipulated by the Constitution,” and said: “Those elected by the people to protect the order of separation of powers and the rule of law. The National Assembly urged them to do what they deserve. ”
The petitioner also said: “Beginning in the UK around 800 AD and stipulated in the US Constitution, the government and the National Assembly should prepare for legislative legislation for ‘judicial democratization’,” he said. . “The judicial reform that should have taken place during the days of Supreme Court Justice Yang Seung-tae As a result of the delay, it seems that Korean judges still cannot escape the illusion that” the law is their property ” Today’s terrible sentence proved that the Korean judiciary had no law and no conscience. Therefore, we urge real judicial reform. ”
He added: “I call for legislation of a jury system that can achieve ‘judicial democracy’. Please legislate so that judges can be replaced by elected office rather than appointments so that ‘judicial democracy’ can be achieved.”
Earlier, the 25-2 Criminal Settlement Department of the Seoul Central District Court (Deputy Judges Lim Jeong-yeop, Kwon Seong-su, Kim Sun-hee) convicted Professor Jeong, who was charged with obstruction of work on the 23rd. , to a fine of 500 million won for four years in prison and arrested the court, saying there is fear of destruction of evidence. did.
[ad_2]
