[ad_1]
The court also saved Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. The Twelfth Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Presiding Judge Hong Soon-wook) said on the 24th: “The two-month suspension of the President’s disposition against Yun on the 16th is from the date of the sentencing of the sub-case for the cancellation of the disciplinary disposition of this court until the 30th day.
Consequently, President Yoon returned to work eight days after his suspension from work. Following the suspension of the ban from duties on the 1st, the court also raised President Yoon’s hand. It is expected that several months will pass before the conclusion of the main lawsuit on the cancellation of the disciplinary action, but given that the remaining term of President Yoon is about seven months, it is highly likely that this decision will fill the mandate in a stable way.
On the 25th, all the morning groups saw that it was President Yoon’s victory and reported that there would be a political coup for President Moon Jae-in, who granted discipline. The analysis also suggested that Lame Duck will accelerate at the end of the presidential term. There were several newspapers with similar headlines for the main article on the front page.
Kyunghyang Shinmun “The court annulled the discipline of ‘President Moon’s House’ Yoon Seok-yeol”
The Dong-A Ilbo “Back to 尹 … President Wen’s discipline, the court revoked”
Segye Ilbo “Suk-yeol Yoon goes back to work … The presidential decision court was annulled.”
Chosun Ilbo “Suk-yeol Yoon returns … The court overturned the presidential decision.”
JoongAng Ilbo “President Moon’s discipline for Yoon Seok-yeol, the court annulled”
The Hankyoreh “Suk-yeol Yoon is president again … The court effectively cancels the disciplinary action”
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, who enforced General Yoon’s discipline, was also a difficult claim. In an editorial, the Kyunghyang Shinmun said: “The Blue House has argued that President Yoon’s disciplinary action is not the will of President Moon, but only reapproves the disciplinary action requested by Minister Chu, but the ultimate responsibility is the responsibility of the President Moon. ” “President Moon must immediately curse Minister Chu, who lobbied for unreasonable discipline,” he wrote.
The Chosun Ilbo focused on criticizing the president. On page 3 of this document, “Chu Mi-ae tries to expel Yoon Seok-yeol … In an article titled” President Wen in the lame duck crisis, “he said:” In the passport, this court decision would involve a severe blow to President Moon’s personnel rights, and there were concerns that it would lead to the acceleration of the lame duck at the end of the term, placing a great burden on the government administration. “The Dong-A Ilbo also mentioned ‘Lame Duck’ in the article on page 4. The editorial title of Chosun Ilbo on this day was “The ruling of the return of President Yoon is the judgment of the law on the texts.”
The Blue House announced that there was no announcement of his position late on the 24th when the court decision was made. Many newspapers interpreted this as a shock to the Blue House over the court decision. Chosun Ilbo reported, “As President Yoon is expected to return to his office immediately and expedite the ‘investigation of living power,’ he has to bear the burden of that.”
Chosun Ilbo said in the article that the purpose of the prosecution reform had waned. The newspaper said: “The reform of the prosecution, which has become ‘print Yun Seok-yeol’, will probably lose a lot of power.” “The significance of the high-ranking public officials criminal investigation agency that President Moon emphasized the launch of the new year and the ruling party pushed for the revision of the law. It is said that it will also fade.”
As a result of the judicial decision, the errors of the current government were emphasized in the media, and mixed positions were expressed in politics according to the interests of the opposition parties.
The power of the people expressed Yun’s return as a “precious Christmas present.” On the 24th, People’s Strength spokesperson Bae Jun-young said: “The court ruling prevented the provocation of the ‘prosecution transformation’ in the form of ‘prosecution reform.’ It is like a Christmas present given relief that we are completely in legal order. ” “The night before Christmas, the Republic of Korea confirmed that the rule of law was not dead,” all members of the Judicial Branch of Justice and People’s Law said in a briefing. “The Korean people received a valuable Christmas gift.
The Justice Party maintained the position that it respected the judicial decision. Jeong Ho-jin, chief spokesman for the Justice Party, said: “It appears that raising questions about procedural legitimacy has contributed greatly to the court’s ruling.” “There may be disagreements, but it is reasonable to respect and follow the results as long as the court decision was issued. I said.
On the other hand, the ruling party criticized the ruling. Choi In-ho, the chief spokesman for the Democratic Party, said on the day: “We express our deep regret that the judgment of the judiciary this time on serious crimes that the administration decided to discipline in accordance with legal procedure did not adequately reflect the seriousness.” . “I am concerned that it will damage the government and generate mistrust in the judiciary, which will intensify the division of national opinion.”
He also said the legitimacy of the reform of the prosecution. Chief Spokesman Choi said: “We will continue to systematically and vigorously promote the prosecution reforms, which have been promoted since before this ruling, and we will launch the airlift smoothly.”
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]