[ad_1]
[앵커]
The court accepted the request for a stay of execution, which Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol appealed the two-month disciplinary measure. President Yoon returned to work after his last suspension from work. Let’s listen in detail connecting journalists. Reporter Lim Seong-ho! Following the last suspension of duties, the court accepted Mr. Yun’s request to suspend the disciplinary execution. Yes, the Seoul Administrative Court said it was citing part of President Yoon Seok-yeol’s two-month stay of execution. It was decided to suspend the effect of suspension for two months to 30 days from the date of the sentence of the disciplinary annulment action. General Yoon’s reaction has yet to come out. The Justice Ministry also said it would confirm the court decision first and said it has no other position at this time. With this, Mr. Yoon was able to return to work once more after his last suspension. The details will be understood only when the court decision comes out, but when the court cited part of the request for stay of execution, it seems that in the first place, it has recognized Yun’s irreparable damage and the need to urgently prevent it. The last time the suspension was suspended, the court found that the suspension of President Yoon’s duties undermined the political independence and neutrality of the prosecution. It is noteworthy if the judgment of the court, which saw the suspension of the execution of this disciplinary action, also issued the same judgment. In particular, in this interrogation on the stay of execution, not only the requirements for the stay of execution were considered, but also the legitimacy of the discipline and the validity of the reasons. These matters are usually just a matter of the main lawsuit, the disciplinary cancellation lawsuit. However, this time, because it was the disciplinary committee and even the presidential residence, the court deepened the matter. So in the previous interrogations, if the composition of President Yun’s disciplinary committee was legal on both sides, and what was the purpose of the court analysis document that sparked the ‘sentencing inspection’ controversy? In addition, we asked seven key questions, such as whether it is possible to initiate the prosecution without the approval of the Attorney General. At the second interrogation this afternoon, we listened carefully to the answers. The court decision made it impossible for the Justice Ministry to avoid criticism that it had prompted the punishment of President Yun. Furthermore, President Moon Jae-in, who re-approved it, is expected to confront the liability theory. I am YTN Seong-ho Lim from the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN awaits your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
