[ad_1]
Top Suspected Dating Fake and Private Equity Issues
Attention along with stay of execution of Seok-yeol Yoon, who played a role in the indictment
viewer
The first court ruling on Dongyang University professor Chung Gyeong-shim, who was put on trial on suspicion of an entrance exam for children and private equity funds, is released today. It has been about a year and three months after the prosecution charged Chung with falsifying the Tong Yang University subpoena on September 6 last year, when the hearing of former Justice Minister Cho Kook was held.
Part 25 of the Seoul Central District Court Criminal Agreement (Presiding Judge Lim Jeong-yeop) will hold a first trial for Professor Jeong at the Seoul Central District Court Intermediate Court No. 311 at 2 pm on the 23rd. At the trial of the decision, the prosecution asked the court to sentence Professor Jeong to a fine of 900 million won for seven years in prison and order an additional 164 million won. At that time, the prosecution explained why Professor Chung had to be severely punished for about an hour while he was present. The prosecution emphasized that “as an elite class, he tried to pass on education and committed illegal and illegal activities to pass,” and stressed that “Professor Jeong damaged the entrance examination system and caused a sense of loss and despair in many young and parents”. did. Later, the prosecution condemned Professor Chung’s suspicion of illegal property growth, “Professor Jeong, who is the spouse of the Blue House, pursued unjust private interests and was a new crime of political collusion” and “as the spouse of a high-ranking public official, destroyed the white paper trust system and disturbed the order of the capital market. It was an incident. “
Most controversial in the trial was whether or not Professor Jeong forged the Tong Yang University subpoena. In July, the prosecution directly proved the falsification of the subpoena in court. He refuted Professor Chung’s claim that the quote cannot be faked, saying that it is “coming.” On the other hand, in this regard, Professor Jeong refuted that “the subpoena from the prosecution and the original subpoena made in court have different characters and the thickness and thickness of the president’s seal.”
Suspicion of private equity is also a major problem. In particular, it is noteworthy how much this case will affect Professor Chung’s case, as former Minister Cho’s fifth village nephew received a first trial decision earlier. The prosecution alleged that Mr. Cho inflated the investment amount related to Kolink Private Equity (PE) to report false changes to the Financial Services Commission, signed a false consulting contract with Professor Jeong, and evidence that an employee of Korink PE will erase the related data. All three charges, including those of teachers, were at the request of Professor Chung, and they are considered accomplices.
viewer
The ruling against Professor Jung was published just before the court decision on the request for stay of execution by Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who played a significant role in the prosecution, for a two-month suspension. If Professor Jeong is found guilty and President Yoon returns to work, the way forward will be smooth, but if Professor Jeong is found guilty of innocence and President Yoon’s decision on honesty is not overturned, it will be a severe blow.
/ Reporter Kyungwoon Lee [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >
