[ad_1]
In a statement released to the newsroom on the 21st, Samsung Electronics said: “Media Today, there are suspicions that Samsung has informed the media about the facts and other content related to the report of the professional audience committee to form an opinion. favorable public, and some civic groups criticized Samsung. “But this is completely different from the facts and does not correspond to common sense,” he said.
In the media today 19, through an article that read: “Reported on the” Affirmative Assessment of the Compliance Committee “of the former judges of Samsung and Kang Il-won,” the report recently revealed that the ruling The former judge of the Constitutional Court was “positive.” Samsung sent ‘reference material’ to reporters, and it was revealed that the reporters wrote it. “
 |
| [서울=뉴스핌] Reporter Kim Sun-yeop = Samsung Electronics Newsroom today announced its position in the 21st media. 2020.12.21 [email protected] |
Meanwhile, Media Today presented the results of its own analysis that member Kang Il-won made evaluations such as ▲ 9 insufficient ▲ 7 somewhat insufficient ▲ 1 no opinion ▲ 1 positive among 18 evaluation items.
In this sense, Samsung Electronics refuted that Media Today had reported quite falsely.
Samsung Electronics noted that “the result of Media Today’s self-analysis is an incorrect analysis of the content of the final report of the professional judges released to the general public in accordance with a court decision of the 18th, and does not serve the entire purpose.”
Samsung Electronics said: “In the final report, committee member Kang’s positive evaluation was much higher than the negative evaluation, and the media that analyzed and reported the content after the report was published also made this evaluation.” .
According to the actual evaluation report, regarding the effectiveness of the Compliance Committee, Kang said: “Overall, the Compliance Committee is carrying out more improved compliance activities than before, such as monitoring and supervising top management, what which is difficult for the company’s internal compliance organization to do, generally neutral or positive.
Samsung Electronics also strongly denied the suspicion of manipulation of public opinion asserted by Media Today.
Samsung Electronics said: “Kyunghyang newspaper and Hankyoreh newspaper obtained the report independently on the 16th, and it was the beginning of (this incident) that they both analyzed and reported on.” We have reported through various channels, including, and have sincerely explained the facts as far as possible.
On the other hand, the Minbyun People’s Economic Committee, the Solidarity Participation Economic and Financial Center and the Democratic Union said in a comment on the 19: “The criminal activity that took place in the Gukjeong Nongdan trial was committed by Vice President Lee Jae-yong, not by the Samsung Group “Is it necessary to mobilize it?”
In this regard, Samsung Electronics said: “We are one of seven affiliates that have entered into an agreement with the Compliance Committee. Under this agreement, the Compliance Committee independently oversees and controls our compliance obligations.” It is a natural responsibility to accurately explain the facts about reports that distort the will and undermine credibility. “
Finally, Samsung Electronics added: “We express our deep regret for reporting a partial report that could harm the company, employees and shareholders.”
[ad_2]
