“Prosecutor’s Office of the Prosecutor’s Office that brought out the abuse of authority from Shim Jae-cheol”



[ad_1]

Shim Jae-cheol, the Prosecutor of the Ministry of Justice.  Yunhap news

Shim Jae-cheol, Prosecutor of the Ministry of Justice. Yunhap news

Assistant Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, Chuncheon District Attorney’s Office, Wonju Branch Commissioner Kim Yoo-cheol criticized Justice Department Attorney General Shim Jae-cheol for his involvement in Yoon’s disciplinary procedures.

On the 17th, Chief Kim posted a post addressed to Director Shim on the prosecution’s internal network, ‘Eprus’. Chief Kim Ji-won served as the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Information and Investigation Policy Officer, and is the person who requested that President Yoon remain as a staff officer.

He did not directly mention Director Shim’s name, but said: “At the beginning of last month, the ‘analysis document for the court’ was passed from his hand to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice. I think it is something fictitious.” , said. Director Shim said he was very upset when it was reported that he had been reported on a “suspicion of trial” while serving as the chief prosecutor’s anti-corruption and power department.

He said: “Is it a document created by prosecutors for the media game? In what media did the content of the document appear before November?” Regarding the complaints of violation of the Law on Protection of Personal Information, he noted: “Is the world punished for hearing such words from a colleague that” the judge and the prosecutor are related “?

He continued: “The prosecutor who reviewed the document at the prosecutor’s office and the chief prosecutor who attended the so-called ‘6-member meeting’ on the 24th of last month gave opinions that there was no problem, but they were deleted from the report. or they were reprimanded. ” “The magic that tried to boost public opinion by turning it into an ‘ancient document full of scary stories’ stopped when the document was published,” he said.

Chief Kim Ji-cheong also mentioned another episode of the “Sanggat rebellion incident” between Supreme Prosecutor’s Office executives at Sangga’s home over the prosecution of former Justice Minister Cho Kuk in January. At that time, Director Shim, the new head of the anti-corruption force of the great prosecutor’s office, received protests asking: “Why is my country innocent?”, “Are you a prosecutor?”

“I heard more shameful words in that place the day there were shameful words,” Kim Ji-cheong said. I said, “Even elementary school students don’t openly reveal their inner feelings.”

In addition, “there was a report that wrote that in the statement that he presented to the disciplinary committee, ‘if the president is president, he will become a prosecutor’s dictatorship,'” he said. “Who did the president say would become president? Who has a political perspective?”

Chief Kim also pointed out that Director Shim’s series of actions could constitute an offense against the exercise of ex officio abuse rights.

As he said about the statute of limitations (7 years) for the prosecution, he said: “I don’t know how long his career will last until December 15, 2027, what kind of sophistry and lies he will try to cover, but prosecutors across the country have said: ‘It is illegal.’ “The opinions were collected,” he emphasized, “None of the constitutional requirements are lacking, such as the exercise of authority, the impure purpose and the absence of illegal procedures and grounds.”

Reporter Kim Ji-hye [email protected]




[ad_2]