[ad_1]
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol was the first to be sanctioned as incumbent president, and Attorney General Yoon, who became the center of controversy in every disciplinary proceeding, said he was “a person who tries to externally pressure the trial of through the inspection of a judge. ” It was confirmed that it was presented to the committee.
Shim Jae-cheol, “Suk-yeol Yoon and other special cases, conveyed opinions to the trial with the judge’s documents”
According to key disciplinary committee officials, on the 16th, Director Shim submitted a written opinion on one of the reasons for the disciplinary action, the “court analysis document,” before President Yoon’s disciplinary committee’s second deliberation on the day. previous. Witnesses were initially scheduled to appear but suddenly withdrew and expressed their intention with a written opinion. He received a report on his mandate as an anti-corruption force from the chief prosecutor in February, when the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office for Investigation Policies and Information Policy (now the Office of Investigative Information) produced this document.
Director Shim said in his opinion statement, “(through the document) special police prosecutors, led by President Yoon, are trying to collect personal information from judges and the media.” He also directly criticized Yun, saying, “Through this, he is a person who has a lot of trouble pushing out of trial and carrying out his intentions.”
This opinion was submitted to President Yun’s disciplinary committee and defense attorney, and is said to have influenced the decision of the state and disciplinary level. After reviewing the opinion, Chairman Yoon tried to refute it by questioning a witness against Director Shim. However, Principal Shim’s witness examination was withdrawn and he asked the disciplinary committee for preparation time to present a rebuttal document to the disciplinary committee. However, the disciplinary committee went ahead with the deliberation, so it was ultimately unsuccessful.
The informant, the disciplinary commissioner and even the witnesses …
Director Shim is a person who has been controversial since President Yun’s discipline inspection process. He is singled out as the person who delivered the ‘court of law analysis documents’ obtained by the anti-corruption chief of the grand prosecutor’s office through the head of the prosecution department Dong-soo Han to the Ministry of Justice during the course of the prosecution of the General Yoon. If Director Shim actually handed it over to a manager, it could amplify the suspicion that the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office had communicated in advance for President Yun’s discipline.
Director Shim also called for a “cheat avoidance” controversy in the first deliberation held on the 10th. He attended the deliberation as a member of the disciplinary committee at the time. After that, when Yoon filed an avoidance request against four disciplinary members (a total of five members), including himself, he participated in discussions on how to evade other members, helped make the decision to dismiss, and resigned from the disciplinary committee.
President Yoon “I will correct the mistake in accordance with the constitution and laws”
On the other hand, General Yoon went to work in the morning after being punished with a two-month suspension at 4 a.m. this day. In the future, after the Minister of Justice proposes the disciplinary committee resolutions to President Moon Jae-in, the President will be suspended from President Yoon’s office when the President is approved. If the disciplinary action takes effect after the president’s office, Yun’s attorney plans to file an administrative complaint and a request for stay of execution against the disciplinary action. General Yoon said, “It is an illegal and unreasonable measure that presents illegal procedures and unsubstantiated reasons to expel the attorney general for a period.”
[류영욱 기자][ⓒ 매일경제 & mk.co.kr, 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]