[단독]Shin Seong-sik raised his hand with an abstention of “I do not admit the charges.”



[ad_1]

Shin Seong-sik, head of the Supreme Prosecutor's Office Anti-Corruption Force, attended the prosecution's disciplinary commission on the 15th. [연합뉴스]

Shin Seong-sik, head of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Anti-Corruption Force, attended the prosecution’s disciplinary commission on the 15th. [연합뉴스]

It was confirmed that the head of the anti-corruption force Shin Seong-sik, who attended as a member of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s disciplinary committee, which continued until the early morning of the 16th, abstained from the disciplinary vote against Yoon.

Shin Seong-sik doesn’t avoid the disciplinary committee himself

Director Shin said that the six disciplinary charges (judge’s document, Channel A case, etc.) brought by Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae were “the charges are not recognized.” Prosecutor Shin is known as ‘Chu Mi-ae Line’, who was appointed by Minister Chu and served as a member of President Yoon’s disciplinary committee.

The Acting Chairman of the Disciplinary Committee of the Ministry of Justice, Jung Han-jung, said in a phone call with JoongAng Ilbo on the 16th, “Prosecutor Shin abstained from the final disciplinary vote and did not admit the charges against President Yun.” Acting Jung said, “The two-month disciplinary measure for President Yoon’s suspension was finally decided by me, Yong-gu, Vice Minister of Justice, and Professor Ahn Jin.” It is said that none of the members of the disciplinary committee suggested the removal of President Yun.

Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae (left) addresses the Ministry of Justice on the 16th. On the morning of the same day, Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol addresses the Supreme Prosecutor's Office. [연합뉴스]

Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae (left) addresses the Ministry of Justice on the 16th. On the morning of the same day, Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol addresses the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. [연합뉴스]

尹 side “avoid” Yonggu Lee “Where is that?”

Around 4 a.m. that day, Interim Chung revealed to the media that “the two-month suspension of President Yoon’s suspension was decided unanimously by the members,” and criticism of the new prosecutor was infested within the prosecution. Prosecutors in office accused him of “the chief’s staff approved an illegal disciplinary action against the president.” However, the prosecutor Shin did not admit the charges against President Yoon and raised his hand with a vote of abstention.

Yoon said that Prosecutor Shin was appointed as the leaker of KBS Channel A’s misinformation case and submitted a request to evade Prosecutor Shin the day before. General Yoon said: “Before the disciplinary committee witness newspaper, if the prosecutor Shin evades, he will not request an evasion.”

Since then, the prosecutor Shin did not evade and the request for evasion was ultimately dismissed. Prosecutor Shin said he did not even ask a single question in the disciplinary committee’s witness newspaper which lasted about eight hours. General Yoon said, “President Jeong Han-jung and Vice Minister Lee mainly expressed their opinions, and Prosecutor Shin kept silent with a firm expression.”

Reporter Park Tae-in [email protected]




[ad_2]