[ad_1]
Additionally, Democratic Party lawmaker Song Young-gil is conducting an unlimited discussion on the amendment to the South-North Relations Development Act in a plenary session held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the morning of 14. News 1
Furthermore, Democratic Party lawmaker Song Young-gil told the United States in a debate in favor of the amendment to the Inter-Korean Relations Development Act on the 14th, with the aim of banning the spread of the war against North Korea, “They have more than 5,000 nuclear weapons and they develop a means of launching nuclear weapons every year.” How can we force North Korea and Iran to be nuclear-free while reducing nuclear weapons to placing bunker destroyers and developing feasible tactical nuclear weapons? low capacity? ”
“Yongin with North Korean nuclear weapons? Distorted, which means an alternative is needed. “
Representative Song, Chairman of the National Assembly for Foreign Affairs and Transportation, said: “The Joe Biden government must reopen the initiation agreement (strategic arms limit agreement) and the medium-range missile agreement once again.”
He said: “The ban on nuclear proliferation, known as the NPT, is a representative inequality treaty,” he said. “What if they had all nuclear weapons and repressed others to stop having them?”
Next, referring to the case of nuclear development in India, Pakistan, and Iran, “ if the United States thinks that the United States has turned North Korea into a virtual force for nuclear attack, it has manufactured bunker destroyers and tactical nuclear weapons, and is practicing wartime military practice 5025 and pre-emptive nuclear strike, the North will not develop nuclear weapons. Can you try not to?
Furthermore, he asked: “If our country also thinks the other way around, if Chinese and North Korean forces conduct joint military exercises and regularly train to attack the South with tactical nuclear weapons, can’t the South develop nuclear weapons?”
In addition, Congressman Song mentioned that during the Park Geun-hye administration, a group of North Korean defectors tried to spread a DVD of a movie that kills Kim Jong-un on a balloon and said, “Wouldn’t the North shoot a jangsajeong gun? ?
As for Rep. Tae Young-ho, who was the first obstructionist on the revised bill, he said, “If you respect Tae, but you are a responsible party, you should go out and speak the position of a balanced opposition party.” “There are many North Korean defectors who do not agree with the views of the congressman or congressman Ji Sung-ho.”
The opposition party immediately criticized Song’s comments. In an oral comment, spokesman Kim Ye-ryeong said: “The obstructionism of the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Assembly was fraught with misdeeds to ‘understand North Korea’s position’ rather than simply asking or questioning it. “I regret the perception of the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Assembly, who considers freedom of expression and freedom of expression as” a defector from North Korea. ”
“Sending a brochure criticizing President Kim Jong-un makes us suspicious of our ears,” he said. “Whenever there was a provocation, we first provided a bill for the assertion of North Korea and the provocation of North Korea against South Korea.” “It’s like giving ourselves indulgences for our actions.”
Song Young-gil “Yongin, does North Korea possess nuclear weapons? Distorted, which means an alternative is needed. ”
In response, Congressman Song refuted that his comments on the day of the ‘Unequal Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)’ were distorted.
Rep. Song later wrote a funky edit on his Facebook page, referring to the deadly acronym “Gyulhwawiji,” “to twist my words and misinterpret them as giving up and tolerating North Korea’s denuclearization diplomacy.” I refuted it.
“It is making the United States, which has nuclear weapons, recognize as a logic that it cannot insist on giving up its nuclear weapons against North Korea,” he said. “It is not something new, but this media behavior is something very serious.”
“The point of observation is this: it is unfair for the NPT to tolerate the vested interests of the permanent members of the Security Council (the US, Russia, China, Britain and France) and to oppose nuclear possession by others. countries “. “However, he said that the NPT is necessary for the aspect that contributes to preventing nuclear proliferation,” he explained.
Instead, he said: “For the NPT to have the least legitimacy, nuclear powers should not threaten to attack non-nuclear-armed countries with nuclear weapons. So will non-nuclear powers give up their motives for wanting to have a nuclear power? nuclear?” .
“It was also pointed out that if a practice scenario for a first nuclear strike against North Korea were introduced in the joint training between the United States and the ROK, it would be possible to persuade North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons.”
Representative Song said, “Along with the above arguments, I also made a statement in support of President Park Chung-hee’s theory of self-defense. Since we began developing missiles in 1979 during the Park Chung-hee regime, we emphasize success. to develop a ballistic missile five years before North Korea. ” “Naturally, we would have tried nuclear development if the United States had not provided a nuclear umbrella,” he said.
He stressed that “there is a need for a practical alternative to resolve the threat to North Korea’s security through nuclear weapons,” he said. “This is editorial technology that makes the case for accepting North Korea’s nuclear weapons that emphasize alternatives to induce North Korea’s nuclear abandonment.” It looks very flashy, but it’s cowardly, “he added.
Reporter Bae Jae-seong [email protected]
[ad_2]
