[ad_1]
[앵커]
If disciplinary action is reached against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, it will be decided tomorrow. The second deliberation takes place in the morning and a fierce neurological warfare is expected tomorrow, as there are procedural issues such as the composition of the disciplinary committee and the method of questioning witnesses. I’ll connect the reporters. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung! What will be the procedure in President Yoon Suk-yeol’s Disciplinary Committee tomorrow? The second deliberation date of the Disciplinary Committee by President Yoon Suk-yeol will be held tomorrow at 10:30 am. An interrogation process is scheduled for eight Witnesses adopted last day. The composition is divided into 4 to 4 according to whom to make a favorable declaration. Four people, including Supreme Prosecutor Han Dong-soo, Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office Lee Seong-yoon, Gwangju District Attorney General Jin-woong Jeong, and Shim Jae-cheol, are among the people to make a statement. favorable to Minister Chu Mi-ae. On the other hand, Prosecutors Ryu Hyeok from the Ministry of Justice, Prosecutor Park Young-jin, Superintendent of the Ulsan District Prosecutor’s Office, Sohn Jun-sung, Chief Prosecutor and Prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa are expected to represent the position of President Yoon. The attendance of Supervisor Han Dong-soo, District Attorney Seong-yoon Lee, and Deputy District Attorney Jeong Jin-woong is uncertain, and other people are likely to attend. The committee continues to verify the presence of witnesses. Prior to the full-scale questioning, the evasion resolution process is expected to continue. President Yoon Seok-yeol says that the disciplinary members who joined the disciplinary committee after the disciplinary claim should be excluded, and is expressing his willingness to request a challenge against Professor Jeong Han-jung, who served as the president’s representative. Vice Minister Yong-gu Yong-gu or the head of the Great Sword Anti-Corruption Force Shin Seong-sik may also be eligible for the challenge. The committee plans to complete the disciplinary decision tomorrow, but Professor Jeong Han-joong left room for another meeting to be held depending on the progress of the cross-examination of the witnesses. President Yoon Suk-yeol, who was not present for the last date, is constantly struggling to attend the second date. Even after the first deadline, do the Disciplinary Committee and Chairman Yoon Seok-yeol continue to fight over procedural matters? The disciplinary committee consists of 7 members, including the president. Yoon’s side raised the question that if there was a vacancy, such as when the Minister of Justice, who is the disciplinary plaintiff, was removed from the post of president, a member of the preliminary committee should have been appointed to form the committee. Consequently, the deliberation on the 10th was illegal and invalidated, and a written statement was delivered to the disciplinary committee calling for the reorganization of the disciplinary committee with 7 members tomorrow. In addition, he asked the Ministry of Justice to disclose information on the composition of the preliminary members and the date of nomination, saying that it would verify whether the preliminary members named among the prosecutors were properly trained. On the other hand, the disciplinary committee has no problem. Professor Jeong Han-jung argued that the appointment of a preliminary member was not an obligation, but was at the discretion of the chairman, and that it was not necessary to appoint a preliminary member as most of the committee members were present and meeting the physicians quorum. Members of the preliminary committee are reported to include Im Eun-jeong, a policy researcher for the prosecution, who has been critical of the prosecution’s organization. The neurological warfare continues despite the witness questioning procedure. President Yoon Suk-yeol has strongly opposed the disciplinary committee’s position that only disciplinary members have the authority to ask questions. Professor Jeong Han-jung, who was emphasizing the principle, took a step back and said that he could give lawyers the authority to ask questions. He explained that if the number of questions is so high that it is difficult to ask, he may question the lawyer. As such, the two sides are in fierce conflict over the procedure until shortly before the second due date, so work is expected in tomorrow’s deliberation process. Until now, YTN Kang Hee-kyung at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office[[email protected]]is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
