[ad_1]
[앵커]
The unprecedented disciplinary commission of the Attorney General’s Office, held yesterday at the Ministry of Justice, will continue on the 15th. Eight witnesses have also been adopted and the battle between the Ministry of Justice and President Yoon Suk-yeol is expected to be fierce during the interrogation process. There is a reporter in the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. Reporter Lim Seong-ho! Yesterday there was no conclusion, but regarding the disciplinary committee, is there any reaction from President Yoon Suk-yeol? President Yun left for work at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office around 8:30 in the morning. Yesterday he did not disclose his position regarding the disciplinary committee. Yoon did not attend the disciplinary committee yesterday after hard work. It was not officially disclosed but was reported due to the issue that the disciplinary committee procedure was unfair. Instead, special attorneys were present. Yun’s disciplinary committee started yesterday around 10:30 a.m. and ended until 8 p.m. Yoon argued that the reasons for the investigation and disciplinary action were unfair and that there were problems with the procedure. In particular, the Ministry of Justice did not deliver in advance the list of disciplinary and did not allow the reading and copying of the disciplinary files properly, for which it requested a postponement of the term. The disciplinary committee was not accepted. Even after the disciplinary committee was opened, the faces of the disciplinary committee members were raised. They are said to be members of the Ministry of Justice who intervened in the prosecution of President Yoon, or outsiders who have expressed opinions hostile to the prosecution. For this reason, four of the five members of the disciplinary committee, including Professor Jeong Han-jung, who served as the president’s representative, Professor Anjin of Chonnam National University School of Law, Yong-gu Lee, Vice Minister of Justice, and Jae-cheol Shim, the Attorney General of the Ministry of Justice, were questioned. However, after a vote, the disciplinary committee rejected the impeachment request from President Yoon’s side. In this process, the head of the prosecution office, Shim Jae-cheol, who requested the denial, participated in a vote on whether or not the other members should evade, and the disciplinary committee was confirmed as a four-member system. Since the debate on the disciplinary committee procedure has dragged on, there has not been a full review of the reasons for the disciplinary action. The questioning of witnesses will be carried out in earnest in the disciplinary committee, which continues on the 15th. Yes, yesterday, eight witnesses were adopted by the disciplinary committee. Earlier, President Yoon’s side requested eight witnesses, and the disciplinary committee excluded “the person in charge of the inspection of the Buddha’s name” and included the prosecutor’s commissioner Shim Jae-cheol ex officio. Among them, the prosecutor Ryu-hyuk of the Ministry of Justice, who was controversial for having been “ approved ” during the trial of General Yoon, the chief prosecutor Sohn Joon-seong, who was in charge of the writing department of the “ “ Suspected sentencing investigation document, ” and Chief Prosecutor Park Young-jin, who was in the line of command of the attorney general of Case A, are willing to assist on the Channel. It is known to be strong. In fact, Sohn and Attorney General Park were on hold at the Justice Ministry yesterday to prepare for the adoption of witnesses. However, it is unclear if the witnesses in the counterpoint to President Yoon, such as Seoul Central District Prosecutor Lee Seong-yoon and Deputy Prosecutor Jeong Jin-woong, who are involved in the self-harm case, are in the opposite direction. This is because, unlike court witnesses, disciplinary committee witnesses are not legally required to attend. The disciplinary committee, which will continue on the 15th, will question the witnesses present. The biggest problem appears to be the illegality of the ‘Judge’s Inspection Suspicion Document’, which is one of the key reasons for this disciplinary claim. While the disciplinary committee plans to close the resolution that day, there are also observations that the number of adopted witnesses may require an additional date or two. I am YTN Seong-ho Lim from the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
