Joseon “Yabawi” and Hankyoreh “Deception” in “Reversal of exclusive prosecution rights”



[ad_1]

Chosun Ilbo and Hankyoreh criticize the Democratic Party for maintaining the ‘exclusive prosecution rights of the FTC’

In addition, the ‘3 Fair Economy Law’ promoted by the Democratic Party (amendment to the Fair Trade Law, amendment to the Commercial Law and the Supervision Law of the Business Group of the Financial Complex) passed the plenary session on the 9th, last day of the ordinary National Assembly.

However, all the newspapers criticized the ruling party for the bill that was withdrawn from the original bill. The ‘Amendment of the Commercial Law’ was reviewed and processed with the content that the government’s proposal to limit voting rights to the largest shareholder and related persons to 3% when the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly elected a member of the audit committee as external director would allow every 3% of the vote. In other words, by solving ‘3% total’ as ‘3% for individuals’, the device to keep majority shareholders weakened.

▲ 5 pages of Hankyoreh on the 10th.
▲ 5 pages of Hankyoreh on the 10th.

What became more controversial was the ‘Fair Trade Law Amendment’. The abolition of exclusive prosecution by the Fair Trade Commission, which was also President Moon Jae-in’s promise, became something the political affairs committee did not have at the last minute. Exclusive complaint issuance is a system in which the prosecution can bring a prosecution (prosecution) only when there is a complaint from the Fair Trade Commission for a case related to the Fair Trade Law. At first, the ruling party, which insisted on abolition, changed its position from “abolition” to “maintenance” when the company took notice.

The ruling party passed a bill to abolish exclusive impeachment rights with the Justice Party in the agenda coordinating committee, and again changed positions when the approved law reached the general meeting of the political affairs committee. . Unlike the mediation committee, the existence of the Justice Party does not affect the party’s position in plenary. It is noted that ‘Jeonguidang’ was used in this process.

The Hankyoreh said on the fifth page: “Democracy, changing the sale of exclusive high-speed tickets … It criticized the ruling party in an article entitled” I concluded with the ‘maintenance’ of the party. ” The Hankyoreh said: “In order to prevent the Fair Trade Commission from ‘taking care of the behavior of companies’, the ruling party took the initiative in providing for the abolition of the ‘right of exclusive complaint’ contained in the revision of the Trade Law. Fair by the government. Furthermore, the Democratic Party heard the reason that eliminating the sole prosecutorial authority would increase the authority of the prosecution, undermining the purpose of the prosecution reform that the government is focusing on. “

The Hankyoreh said: “However, there is criticism that the ruling party, which gave in to the demands of the business community and withdrew from the legislation for economic democratization, used a logic of ‘prosecution reform’ that was far from of essence and justified his actions. It was President Moon Jae-in’s promise to abolish the FTC’s exclusive right of complaint. ” The Hankyoreh interpreted that the actions of the ruling government party were removed from the system so that investigative agencies could conduct investigations only through indictments from civic groups, minority shareholders and competitors, not the FTC.

The Hankyoreh also noted that he used Justice Party. The Hankyoreh said: “However, at the request of the people’s power, the Democratic Party approved its own amendment to maintain exclusive impeachment rights in the Political Affairs Committee of the National Assembly, an amendment meeting called on the 8th to obtain the cooperation of the Justice Party. I did it.”

▲ 5 pages of the Hankyoreh on the 10th.
▲ 5 pages of Hankyoreh on the 10th.

Complaints were also reported to be emerging within the Democratic Party. The Hankyoreh said: “In the Democratic Party, there were complaints about the bill. It was a criticism that the purpose of the reform that was intended to be included in the bill was going backwards ”. Re-elected Han said: ‘Unlike the government draft, the issue was raised primarily about maintaining exclusive complaints under the Fair Trade Law and easing the 3% rule under the Trade Law. While it was only about the bill, there were more legislators asking what was the reason for the withdrawal plan than the government’s plan, ”he reported.

Chosun Ilbo also harshly criticized the process for the exclusive complaint bill. In an editorial, the Chosun Ilbo said: “The Democratic Party was originally in a position to abolish, but when it was pointed out that abolition would give the prosecution more power, it changed its mind to keep it. The problem is the invoice processing process. ”“ The Democratic Party decided to deal with the Fair Trade Act in one day with the help of the Justice Party by holding a casting boat. The Justice Party is the party to abolish exclusive indictments. The Democratic Party passed the Fair Trade Act that abolished exclusive prosecution rights in the opposite direction to your party’s opinion to get help from the Justice Party. This is because justice does not need help. They filed and passed an amendment to keep the exclusive prosecution rights they want. “

▲ An editorial by Chosun Ilbo on the 10th.
▲ An editorial by Chosun Ilbo on the 10th.

The Chosun Ilbo insisted that the ruling party’s trick was the “yabawi technique.” Chosun Ilbo said: “There is nothing different from the Yabawi class. This will continue in the future.” There is no minimum conscience brake in the fugitive Democratic Party. “

The Hankyoreh also said: “The behavior of the Democratic Party is a hoax that it has rejected even the slightest political morality. The reason the Democratic Party was able to deal with the Fair Trade Act in the Ahn Building Administration was because Justice Party lawmaker Bae Jin-kyo voted to abolish the exclusive indictments. He noted that if Congressman Bae, who held the casting position on the coordinating committee made up of an equal number of opposition parties, disagreed, the amendment to the Fair Trade Law would have been tied to the political committee for up to 90 days “.

▲ Hankyoreh Editorial on the 10th.
▲ Hankyoreh Editorial on the 10th.

The Hankyoreh advised that the Democratic Party apologize to the Justice Party. The Hankyoreh said: “The Democratic Party hopes that the Democratic Party will no longer make silly excuses and correct its mistakes. First, the public apologizes to the Justice Party and rewrites the amendment to the Fair Trade Law, which abolishes exclusive billing rights and must be approved by the National Assembly. “

Newspapers “Promulgate the Law of Punishment for Great Disaster”

On the 9th, the Law of Sanction of Companies in Serious Accidents (Law of Serious Accidents) did not exceed the threshold of the ordinary National Assembly. This bill promotes legislation at the leadership level by the power of the people, which had been passive in the face of workplace accidents. In fact, Representative Lim Ja-min, Democratic Party lawmaker Park Ju-min, and Justice Party lawmaker Kang Eun-mi have proposed a major disaster bill.

▲ 1 page of Hankyoreh on the 5th.
▲ 1 page of Hankyoreh on the 5th.

The Hankyoreh noted that the judicial committee is showing a passive attitude towards the bill. The Hankyoreh said in a cover story: “The aspirations of the citizens were met, but the discussions in the National Assembly were absolutely few. A total of less than two hours was discussed by the 21st National Assembly proposing the severe disasters law as the meeting agenda. On the 26th of last month, in the subcommittee of the Legislative and Judicial Council, the members of the Judicial Power of the Democratic Party met for only 15 minutes to discuss, and the public hearing held on the 2nd was one hour and 36 minutes without power. of the town, ”he reported.

▲ An editorial in the Seoul newspaper on the 10th.
▲ An editorial in the Seoul newspaper on the 10th.

The Seoul newspaper said in an editorial: “There is no question that the reason for this law should be enacted. There are around 2,000 deaths from work accidents a year. The occupational accident recurrence rate was 97%, but only 0.4% was sentenced to prison for the person responsible for the workplace where the accident occurred. The average fine for companies due to industrial death was just 4.5 million won. Statistics show that the punishment of a cotton bat leads to a serious disaster. “

The Seoul newspaper and the Hankyoreh together criticized the Democratic Party. The Seoul newspaper said in an editorial: “However, the Korean Federation of Small and Medium Enterprises and the 16 Associations of Small and Medium Enterprises said yesterday:“ As the industrial safety and health law strengthened at the beginning of the year included the content that would allow corporate representatives to be imprisoned for up to 7 years, triple sanctions need to be imposed on managers. There isn’t, ”he insisted. It is a shame that the Dong-A Democratic Party, which has argued that ‘people come first’, seems to listen only to corporate concerns. “

The Hankyoreh also said in an editorial, “However, the Democratic Party, which led the revision of the Sanan Act two years ago, is consistent with an ambiguous attitude this time. One legislator even told grieving family members from industrial accidents that “the word ‘severe disaster’ does not fit an accident in which one or two people die.” He criticized that it is not practical to shout ‘worker-friendly government’ while neglecting the reality that dying while working has become a natural phenomenon.

▲ 3 pages of the Hankook Ilbo on the 10th.
▲ 3 pages of the Hankook Ilbo on the 10th.

12 beds remaining, Hankook Ilbo noted “What has the government been doing?”

686 people. This is the number of new patients confirmed on day 9. Among them, 524 confirmed cases in the metropolitan area.

Hankook Ilbo said in an article on page 3, “As there are around 600 new corona19 patients every day this month, as the bed shortage becomes a reality, there is a debate about how to secure beds. When the claim came out that a ‘mobilization decree’ should be issued to a large private hospital, objections were raised that it was an impractical solution and an alternative emerged to the operation of several hospitals dedicated to the metropolitan area as in the first epidemic ”.

▲ 3 pages of the Hankook Ilbo on the 10th.
▲ 3 pages of the Hankook Ilbo on the 10th.
▲ An editorial from Hankook Ilbo on the 10th.
▲ An editorial from Hankook Ilbo on the 10th.

In an editorial, Hankook Ilbo said: “The government has improved the stage of social distancing in Seoul and the metropolitan area, where the expansion trend is severe, but the effect has not yet appeared.” The Seoul Metropolitan Government has issued an incubation plan to prepare 150 container-type treatment beds at the inactive site of a municipal hospital, but it appears to be insufficient to keep up with the spread. “

Hankook Ilbo said: “The government has proposed measures to secure 154 additional critically ill beds by the end of this month. Since the beds in public hospitals treating critically ill patients have reached saturation, it is impossible to secure them without the cooperation of large private hospitals. “The private mobilization of insufficient personnel is inevitable. It is no exaggeration to say that it is now an exhibition situation. The government and the medical community must work together to extinguish the crisis in the crown. “

Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.




[ad_2]