[ad_1]
“The political parties decide which candidates to recommend according to the democratic voting process of an electoral group made up of delegates and party members through a democratic selection process.”
The provisions of the Law on the Election of Public Officials (article 47-2) that prohibit the strategic appointment of proportional representatives were repealed within one year of the revision of the law. On the 9th, the reform to the Law on Elections of Public Officials, with the pertinent provisions removed, passed to the plenary session of the National Assembly. After extreme work called ‘Fast Track Situation’, the National Assembly has destroyed one of the backbones of the quasi-linked proportional representation system introduced earlier this year.
This clause, which was removed from the amendment, was called the “Proportional Representative Strategic Appointment Act.” In the last 21 general elections, where the reform to the Law on Elections of Public Officials was applied for the first time, no matter how well known or having a special relationship with the real estate of each party, they will be candidates for proportional representation without going through the process voting in which delegates and activists participate. I could not.
The National Assembly held a plenary session on the 9th and approved an amendment to the Law on the Election of Public Officials, eliminating the provisions of the democratic procedures related to the election of proportional representatives. The bill was approved with 174 votes in favor, 72 against and 19 abstentions. Reporter Ha Jun-ho
When the strategic nomination, which had become a practice, was banned, both opposition parties suffered pain. In particular, the Democratic Party, which had recognized the authority of the party representative to nominate strategic candidates for proportional representatives within 20% of the stabilization rights chosen through the Party Rules (No. 10, Article 3, Article 3 ) fell into confusion. The Democratic Party immediately requested an interpretation from the voters on the possibility of a strategic nomination to the NEC. About this In February, the NEC announced a position that “strategic nomination, which is recommended by determining candidates and rankings for proportional representatives only by the party representative or the Supreme Council, is a violation of the law.” Then each party was busy devising and implementing its own “democratic procedure”, even though it was Burjaburya.
Democratic Party and Justice Party sympathize with the strength of the people
On December 27 last year, when the amendment to the Public Officials Election Law was approved in the plenary session of the National Assembly, members of the Korean Liberal Party flocked to the president’s seat to protest. The amendment to the Public Officials Election Law, which was passed after work like this, was abolished within a year of its application. Another amendment, which eliminated the provisions that regulate the ‘democratic procedure’ related to the election of proportional representatives, was approved in the plenary session of the National Assembly on the 9th. Central photo
It was the power of the people who drew the knife first. On June 4, a month after the general election, Representative Je-won Jang proposed an amendment to the Public Officials Election Law to remove this clause. “The quasi-linked proportional representation system, which was legislated by the XX National Assembly, must be abolished and returned to the previous parallel-type proportional representation system.”While the bill was presented at the general meeting of the Administrative Security Committee of the National Assembly in September and passed the threshold of the Legislative Judicial Committee of the National Assembly on the 8th after two subcommittees for the review of the bill.
Until the bill was brought to plenary, there were no objections. Even the Justice Party, which evaluated the democratic procedure of the proportional representative recommendation process as “included a strong democratic nomination system” (on December 27 last year, then-Justice Party Representative Shim Sang- jeong) agreed to delete the provision. Justice Party lawmaker Lee Eun-ju said at the Second Meeting of the Law Subcommittee on 23 last month: “It is true that the political party, which is an autonomous association, proceeds with public responsibility. It is not convenient to regulate political activity in this way ”, he coincided with the reform project.
Belated criticism of the Justice Party’s “political regression”
The Executive Director of the Justice Party, Shim Sang-jeong, said at a press conference shortly after the amendment to the Election of Public Offices Law was passed in the plenary session of the National Assembly late last year: “The electoral law was approved after a long struggle. The system that had converged with the two major parties turned the wheel in the direction of strengthening the will of the sovereign.” . However, on the 9th, a year later, the provisions of the procedure relating to the selection procedure for proportional representatives, one of the basic pillars of the semi-linked proportional representation system, were abolished.
Then, the Justice Party belatedly criticized the amendment to the Public Officials Election Law before the plenary vote on the 9th. Justice Party representative Jang Hye-young requested a discussion on the bill. the same day and said: “The entire process of party formation and activity decision-making must be carried out in a democratic process, and these principles must be applied to the recommendation of candidates for elections to public office.” He noted that the alternative to the electoral law included an undemocratic toxin clause that repealed the bill that made the last legislative effort in the last legislature, and returned to nominate closed chambers and nominations by crush.
Regarding the point of Representative Chang’s point, Democrat Lee Hae-sik said, “The reason some of the regulations related to the recommendation of proportional representatives have been removed is because it is determined that it is more appropriate to stipulate in law. of parties than in the electoral law. “We are preparing a revised bill that revises the party law (by amending the Public Officials Elections Act) and contains almost the same provisions.”
Reporter Jeong Jin-woo [email protected]
[ad_2]
