[ad_1]
Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul. News 1
The Office of Human Rights Policy of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office initiated an investigation to see if there were violations in the seizure and search process by the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in relation to the ‘Judge’s Inspection Documents’ that led to the Prosecutor’s disciplinary request General Yoon Seok-yeol. The department that was investigating the suspicions related to President Yoon was heavily investigated.
On the 2nd, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office said: “Recently, a petition containing objections and complaints of human rights violations has been filed in relation to the investigation procedure in relation to the seizure and raid of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office.” Said. The subject of the decision to initiate the investigation and distribute the petition was Deputy Prosecutor Cho Nam-gwan, the deputy prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in the event of the removal of President Yoon’s duties.
It is expected that the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office for Human Rights Policy will make the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office the main subject of investigation. In the seizure and registration process of the Office of Investigative Information Policy of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office on 25 last month to investigate the suspicion of the judge’s inspection documents, it will be investigated whether there were illegal elements or human rights violations.
The Office of Human Rights Policy is expected to focus particularly on the suspicion that the Ministry of Justice “ordered” the seizure and search of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. Specifically, the main question is whether the prosecution reported directly to the Ministry of Justice during the seizure and search process, and whether the Ministry of Justice, which should be directed through the attorney general, omitted the then president, Deputy Director General Cho and commanded to frontline prosecutors. Previously, during the search for the seizure the day after Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae’s disciplinary announcement by Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, there was a suspicion that the Ministry of Justice made several calls with the security team. the prosecution that had come to the scene, and that the prosecution team frequently reported the progress of the seizure and search to the Ministry of Justice. .
The Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office for Human Rights Policy may request an investigation from the first line prosecutor’s office if human rights violations or violations are found during the investigation. If a procedural problem is revealed in this investigation, the possibility that the investigation sheet may be directed to the Prosecutor’s Office investigating the suspicion of President Yun or the Ministry of Justice that ordered it cannot be ruled out.
Previously, on the 30th of last month, the solidarity (legal sophistication) of the Legislative Principles of Action (legal improvement) of the Civil Organization accused the Attorney General of the Ministry of Justice Shim Jae-cheol and the Prosecutor of the Department of Justice Park Eun -jeong, suspected of carrying out a seizure and search by the Western District Prosecutor’s Office for the exercise of the rights of the Seoul Prosecutor’s Office. “Director Shim and Park in charge of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office ran the seizure and search site,” said Beop Se-ryeon. “Conducting an illegal seizure and search led the persons involved in the seizure and search to do nothing.” Explained. The Seoul Western District Prosecutor’s Office is investigating the case by assigning it to the 1st Criminal Division.
No problem reporter [email protected]
You can also watch the Naver Et news edited by Hankook Ilbo.
Issues that may interest you
[ad_2]
