[사회]Two days in a row, ‘Inspection Committee and Disciplinary Committee’ …



[ad_1]

[앵커]

The Prosecutor’s Disciplinary Committee will be held the day after tomorrow (2) to determine whether and to what extent President Yoon Seok-yeol will be punished.

It is the schedule that will be the largest basin for the direction of this situation.

Prior to this, tomorrow (day 1) the inspection committee will be held, according to the recommendations made, it is expected that the deliberation of the disciplinary committee will have a significant impact.

This is reporter Lee Jong-won.

[기자]

The Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, issued a request for disciplinary action against President Yoon Seok-yul and an order of exclusion from his functions, and notified this Wednesday designating the deliberation date of the disciplinary committee.

President Yoon or a special counsel will be present and make a statement on the charges of disciplinary action in front of the committee members, and then decide whether or not he should be disciplined.

The disciplinary committee consists of seven members, including the president, and although Minister Chu is the president, the disciplinary complainant cannot participate in the deliberation.

However, since the other members are also Minister-appointed prosecutors or commissioned outsiders, the perspective predominantly reflects Minister Chu’s intention.

Thus, despite the wide variety of disciplinary disciplines ranging from reprimand to dismissal under the Fiscal Discipline Law, there are observations that the most severe disciplinary action, the termination resolution, is strong.

However, the advisory body convened a day before and the recommendations of the Supervisory Commission of the Ministry of Justice are variable.

Not long ago, the Ministry of Justice changed the advice of the supervisory commission in important cases from mandatory matters to optional provisions, and controversy arose over the “passing of the supervisory commission.” I did.

In particular, the fact that a prosecutor who was directly involved in the prosecution at the Ministry of Justice revealed that information that it is not a crime was unilaterally removed from Yoon’s report on the allegations of a “judge’s inspection” may affect the discussion.

In addition, suspicions have been raised that the Ministry of Justice commanded the investigation with overflowing power in the process of seizing and raiding the office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office at the request of an investigation by the Ministry of Justice.

Of course, the Ministry of Justice denies all suspicions and emphasizes that it is a legal process.

However, there is a possibility that the Supervisory Commission concluded that there was a problem with the prosecution process and advised the minister to withdraw the disciplinary action or postpone the disciplinary committee hearing.

In particular, given that more than two-thirds of the oversight committees of the Ministry of Justice are made up of external staff, the direction and level of recommendations of the oversight and oversight committee is expected to have a significant impact on the committee’s discussions. discipline.

This is YTN Jongwon Lee.

※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
[ad_2]