[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol leaves the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul, following a briefing on disciplinary claims and job exclusion by Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae on the night of 24. 2020.11.24 | |
| Ⓒ Yonhap News |
See related photos |
[기사 보강 : 27일 오후 8시]
The clashes between the Ministry of Justice and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol have not ceased, with documents filed amid the suspicions of the judges. On the 27th, President Yoon refuted the investigation request policy that applied the allegations of interference in the exercise of office abuse by the Ministry of Justice, saying: “We have prepared reference materials necessary for the support of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office related to the procedural work, so there is no crime of abuse of authority “.
It was not intended to be an ‘illegal document’ written to disadvantage the subject of surveillance. General Yoon said that this document is “a guidance reference for the Supreme Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office and the Ministry of Public Investigation to carry out trials in important cases of judicial prosecutors in the main office.” Explained.
“Unique reference material created immediately after the court / prosecutor salute in February”
At the same time, he produced a manual for the trial work of the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office. “There are variations in the trial methods for each court, so it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each court and respond appropriately.” Director General Yoon also refuted that the document was not created frequently as a practice, but was only a one-time document.
The Ministry of Justice refuted this afternoon by presenting the Seoul Supreme Prosecutor’s Court Manual. Below is the suggested manual content.
“The judge of the appellate trial has his own way of thinking and proceeding for a long time conformed as the head of the higher court, so there is a great difference in the propensity or method of proceeding with each court, so each judge you must understand the characteristics of judgment destruction and deal with it appropriately. There are many cases of criminal monopoly, and the cases in which there is a question of innocence by years of age must be a problem in the courts, so it is necessary to prepare a complete book.
The Justice Ministry said, “(Illegal inspection matters are not specific to each court), but the personal information and propensity information of the judges of the first trial court was collected and analyzed, and the prosecutors shared this, which means that they must understand the characteristics of the appeals court and deal with them. It is irrelevant, “he emphasized.
General Yoon said, “This case has been prepared as reference material for the court’s style of trial, which was recently organized for the one-time only immediately after the court and prosecutors’ greetings in February.” He stressed that the data collection was also only what he heard from public sources such as the legal officer and prosecutors who participated in the trial.
In particular, the drafting process in the document of whether there was a controversial ‘list of judges who caused the water’, also said: “The content that the lawyer affirmed in the court of the case was heard by the prosecutor of the case, and it was tried as a matter to be known by the command of the great swordsman. Explained.
On the other hand, General Yoon’s side focuses on preparing the judicial response, such as requesting the Ministry of Justice to review the disciplinary file related to the disciplinary deliberation before the interrogation date for the request for suspension of execution, scheduled for the 11 a.m. on the 30th.
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae reiterated the illegality of the document, saying: “Although drafting the document is a normal matter and there is no problem, I was very disappointed that I did not even apologize to the courts and judges. Emphasized.
☞ Related articles
Prosecutors calm down and Yun Seok-yeol raises me, Chu Mi-ae “Great disappointment in attorney general”
[전문] “Without presence” … “Easy to respond to the accusation” … Document of “Illegal investigation of the judges” published http://omn.kr/1qpx0
