[ad_1]
On the morning of the 27th morning, Vice President Kim Seong-won (center), the National People’s Power and others are submitting a request for a state of law investigation to the agenda department of the National Assembly on the morning of 27. Yunhap news
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae issued a statement on the 27th in response to the prosecutors’ collective statement regarding Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s request for disciplinary action and the order to suspend work, emphasizing that the action it was justified. Minister Chu said: “It was achieved by verifying sufficient facts and gathering comprehensive evidence in accordance with proper procedures.” The Minister should know that the reason that the prosecutors complained that the exclusion of duties was illegal and unreasonable was due to the fact that many did not follow the procedure.
Another example of ignoring the procedure was that the Ministry of Justice delayed the inspection commission behind the prosecutor’s disciplinary commission on December 2. Initially, the inspection committee was scheduled to meet on the 27th, but the Ministry of Justice delayed it until December 10th due to the spread of Corona 19. After deciding on discipline, it was a strange procedure to seek advice. When the controversy grew after the prosecutors requested the convening of a meeting saying: “We must hold a meeting before the disciplinary committee,” the Ministry of Justice decided to open the supervisory committee on December 1. It was a problem in that the prosecution policy, which required the oversight of important cases to be consulted by the external oversight committee, was changed to “may be advised” without notifying the oversight commissioners. There is no choice but to suspect a change in regulations targeting Yun.
In contrast to the words of Minister Chu, the suspension of functions of President Yoon on the 24th, the search and arrest of the judges of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office on the 25th, and the investigation request process on the 26th, show that, to Unlike the words of Minister Chu, the evidence was collected after the suspension of the charge. When the prosecutor in the Ministry of Justice was negative about the request for an investigation, Minister Chu even commissioned an investigation by having the prosecutor in charge of his subordinate. Yoon’s refusal to comply with supervision was listed as one of the reasons for the suspension of work, but it can be said that while there is a method to verify the truth through a written investigation, it could be said that it was skipped and went directly to the disciplinary process.
The unprecedented Gamran (檢 亂) joining from the senior prosecutor to the pyeong prosecutor took place because it pushed the impeachment of President Yun into an unprincipled, unprofessional, unprincipled insanity. The question of inspection by the judge is really delicate, but ignoring the laws and procedures cannot be a good alibi.
You can also watch the Naver Et news edited by Hankook Ilbo.
Issues that may interest you
[ad_2]
