[ad_1]
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae attends the general meeting of the Candidate Recommendation Committee held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the afternoon of the 25th. 2020.11.25 Reporter Oh Jong-taek
After the unprecedented suspension of the exercise of his functions against the attorney general in office, the prosecutors initiated their first class action. On the 25th, investigators from the Prosecutor’s Office affiliated with the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office made a statement saying: “It is illegal or unfair to suspend the execution of functions by the Minister of Justice.”
Prosecutors from the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office said on the day that Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae’s disciplinary action against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yol and the suspension of his duties was “illegal and unfair as it seriously damages the rule of law.”
These opinions were collected as a result of a meeting of about 30 prosecutors from the 34th Judicial Research and Training Institute of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. When the post, “ Suspension of Work Execution, ” was posted on Eprus, the prosecution’s internal communication network, around 90 comments were posted in a short time.
They said: “The attorney general directs all investigations of the prosecution and is responsible for the results, and the mandate is guaranteed by law.” “Through difficult procedures and processes, the Disposition.”
He said: “I sincerely request that the Minister reconsider the request for disciplinary action and suspension of duties so that the Prosecutor’s Office can fulfill its duties and responsibilities in accordance with the Constitution and conscience.”
尹 Exclusion from work … Visualization of group revulsion from prosecutors
In fact, among prosecutors, there are specific movements of group opposition, such as the meeting of review prosecutors. A prosecutor said: “The situation is being discussed by each agency.”
The internal notice board of the prosecution has also received criticism. Kim Soo-hyun (30th Judicial Research and Training Institute), human rights inspector at the Jeju District Prosecutor’s Office, said: “To exclude the duty of the president, there must be a reason, rationale, legitimacy and justification. (弔鐘) seems to be ringing, so I’m depressed and terrible, ”he wrote.
Jeju District Attorney Lee Hwan-woo (39th term) said: “I will clearly remember today’s political violence and file a complaint before the story.” Suwon District Attorney Kim Gyeong-mok (term 38) noted that “it is setting a precedent that a minister of a politician can exclude the attorney general in the name of ‘democratic control, reform of the prosecution.”
Reporters Jeong Yu-jin and Kim Soo-min [email protected]
[ad_2]
