[ad_1]
Passport “President Yun, just suspect an organized inspection”
Opposition: “The Democratic Party alters the democratic order with the majority”
Within the indictment, “Minister Chu’s action is ‘political violence'”
Ruling Party’s Own Voice of “Failing to Appear in Court Due to Exclusion of Yoon Seok-yeol”
Mi-ae Chu and Seok-yeol Yoon’s conflict extends to government investigation
viewer
The next day (25) after Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae entered a duty ban measure against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, a political storm broke out. Minister Chu said on the 24th that △ Inappropriate contact with the owner of the media △ Illegal inspection of the judiciary in important cases such as the case of former Minister Cho Kook △ In relation to the case of Channel A and former Prime Minister Han Myung- sook, interfering with surveillance and interfering with the investigation and the means to protect the The facts of the transaction of information related to the prosecution △ Violation of the obligation to cooperate and obstruction of the prosecution during the face-to-face investigation of the president △ The attorney general as attorney general who is the primary supervisor of the affairs of the prosecution as attorney general It was determined that it was no longer acceptable to perform the work. “
□ Passport “President Yun, just suspect the organized inspection”
Members of the ruling party continued to reinforce Minister Chu’s actions. Democratic Party Chairman Lee Nak-yeon told Chairman Yoon at the Supreme Council meeting that day, “Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol asks you to decide for yourself the future of the prosecution.” Pressured to quit. He said, “President Yoon’s charges revealed by the Ministry of Justice are shocking,” he said. “The most shocking thing is the inspections of the judges. The great sword played a central role in gathering and disseminating the propensity of the judge in charge of important cases and private information. Just suspect a systematic inspection, ”he harshly criticized Yoon’s charges.
Furthermore, the Democratic Party has repeatedly expressed its position that it will swiftly launch a state affairs investigation directed at President Yun. Democratic Party spokesman Shin Young-dae met reporters at the National Assembly this morning and said: “We are trying to proceed quickly because there is consensus of various legislators in the investigation of state affairs.” “Among the reasons for the exclusion of functions, judicial inspection is a very serious matter, so the opposition party is also actively involved in this part. I will cooperate.” He said: “If the opposition party refuses to continue with the investigation of state affairs, it can only be seen that in the end it has tolerated the inspection of the prosecution, so I hope that the force of the people will accept the investigation of state affairs of President Yoon for serious criminal acts. “I also urged .
The Democratic Party criticized Yun’s suspicion, especially on suspicion of a judge’s inspection. Spokesperson Shin emphasized that “we must reveal the truth about the illegal investigation of the judge by President Yoon,” and emphasized that “if the judge’s inspection by the attorney general who is the first in constitutional history is true, it is a Serious felony”. He added: “The results of the Ministry of Justice inspection announced yesterday clearly show the need for the airline investment agency (the criminal investigation agency of senior officials). It is a disorder of the national flag and a combined felony by the government judicial nongdan. “” It is impossible to say that the attorney general who led the investigation of the judicial Nongdan and Gukjeong Nongdan conducted an illegal inspection, “he said. prosecutor said it was a normal preparation for the trial, but the perception of not seeing (inspection) illegal is not different from the prosecution in the past dictatorship. “
Representative Lee Soo-jin, who was a former judge, also emphasized, “It is a clear indication that the power of the prosecution and the power of the judicial nongdan are the same as both sides of the coin.” Assemblyman Lee said: “If the information obtained through the investigation was used for purposes other than investigation and prosecution, and furthermore, there is a lot of room for a crime of abuse of office.” It should be done. “He further analyzed that” judicial reform and immediate impeachment of the Nongdan judiciary were confirmed to be necessary because of President Yoon’s inconsiderate charges.
□ Opposition “Democratic Party, disturbing the democratic order with majority seats”
On the other hand, opposition officials raised the level of criticism of Minister Chu. Kim Jong-in, chairman of the Emergency Response Committee, criticized that “perhaps among the democratic countries of the world, it is a first order situation that the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General discarded the functions of the Attorney General due to an emotional conflict between the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General “. For Minister Chu, “Chu’s actions remind me of Kang Qing at the time of the Chinese Cultural Revolution,” he said. “I cannot understand what the Democratic Party intends to pursue with such an act, and even if the Democratic Party won many seats in the National Assembly, it is dominant. I want to ask whether it should play a role in disrupting the democratic order.”
Representative Kim also aimed his arrow at President Moon Jae-in. He said: “The President has the authority to remove the Attorney General, but it is a situation that makes the country look very ridiculous by causing such a situation.” President Moon said he did not say anything. “He added,” I would like to ask what is the role of the president as a personnel officer in this matter, “he said.” The Democratic Party must also resolve this situation with rational judgment, so please Please don’t make the role worse. “Urged.
Ho-young Joo also told the president, “It is a situation where the old regime mobilized to oust the president for reasons that are not the same.” He asked responsibility. He also harshly criticized “If you don’t like President Moon, take political responsibility and fire him.”
□ Inside the accusation “The action of Minister Chu is ‘political violence'”
There was also a confrontation with Minister Chu within the prosecution. Chung Hee-do, the chief prosecutor of the Cheongju District Prosecutor’s Office, said, “Could the minister have done something so amazing alone? It is possible because there are political prosecutors and cooperators who are parasites on the regime ”, he criticized, saying:“ We have to think deeply and discuss whether the orders for the elderly are unjust and then act ”. Suwon District Attorney Kim Gyeong-mok also said: “The Minister of Justice ordered the President to suspend the performance of the President’s duties. It is setting a precedent ”. The day before, the Jeju District Prosecutor’s Office Prosecutor Lee Hwan-woo also lamented that “we and the people will clearly remember today’s political violence committed by Minister Chu by naming the prosecution reform and prosecuting it before the history. In particular, lawyer Kwon Gyeong-ae, who participated in the writing of the ‘Black Book of the Fatherland’, also said on a social networking service (SNS): “Identifying the propensity of the court is one of the routine preparation tasks of the judgment “. Did you see the hype and distortion once or twice? Said a bitter voice. He said: “If the data is comparable to that of the temple, why would a person known as Chu Mi-ae’s anguish as Shim Jae-cheol at that time, as the Great Sword’s anti-corruption chief, stay there?” Said. did.
□ The voice of the ruling party “Failure to appear in court due to the exclusion of Yoon Seok-yeol”
There was also skepticism about the exclusion of President Yoon’s position within the ruling party. Democratic Party lawmaker Cho Eung-cheon stood up to Minister Chu, saying, “If we open a criminal investigation bureau of senior public officials and exclude Yoon Seok-yeol, will justice of justice be upheld? criminal right? ” He asked if the level of disciplinary action for exclusion was appropriate, saying: “I couldn’t help asking if it was the first time in the constitutional ideology of exclusion and disciplinary demand for the attorney general, and if this is the moment and if it is useful for the state and society “. .
Meanwhile, Congressman Cho showed a reserved attitude towards the purpose of the airlift. Although he agreed that prosecution reform was necessary, he raised questions about the direction of the current prosecution reform. Representative Cho said: “Under the name of coordinating the investigative power, the prosecutors, the prosecution, gave up the right to investigate. He pointed out that it could lead to the case under investigation and also provoked the exercise of persecution, which raised various concerns ”.
□ Chu Miae-Yoon Seok-yeol conflict, which extends to the investigation of state affairs
The ruling party demanded a national investigation into President Yun, citing suspicions from a judge’s inspection. The representative of the Democratic Party, Lee Nak-yeon, told the Supreme Council meeting about the reasons for the exclusion of Yoon’s duties. He said: “Please allow the party to review the direction of the government investigation in the country.” He then pressed for the voluntary resignation, saying: “I hope you decide to take command for the future of the prosecution.”
When the ruling party produced the “national affairs investigation card”, the opposition party held an emergency press conference and demanded that Chu Miae investigate national affairs. Ho-young Joo said, “In this case, as the abuse of the authority of the Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae and the unconstitutional power of investigation and command are sufficient, I believe that the investigation of Chu Mi- ae should be carried out as soon as possible. ” In addition, he also urged: “We strongly request that the Democratic Party also demand the government’s investigation into the early closure of Wolseong Unit 1 and the illegal support for the Ulsan mayoral election, which we have been constantly calling for.”
The confrontation between the ruling and opposition parties over the investigation of the state affairs of Chu Miae and Yoon Seok-yeol is expected to continue for a while. A people power official explained: “Because each one proposed a state affairs investigation, it is up to the agreement of the opposition parties to proceed,” and said, “The side that avoids will reject the state affairs investigation.”
/ Reporter Hyein Lee [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >
