[ad_1]
Silence for the second day due to unprecedented labor exclusion
Authorization of civil matters after resolution under the Law on Prosecution and Discipline
Some of the 與 “Give me the opportunity to decide to take over”
野 is a “cowardly president”, “you are not responsible”
viewer
While President Moon Jae-in appeared to have received a previous report of an order to exclude the functions of the attorney general, the first in the constitution’s history, political interpretations on how to interpret the ‘president’s silence’ continue.
Earlier, Blue House spokesman Kang Min-seok said, “President Moon received a related report just before the announcement from the Minister of Justice, and it was not mentioned.” Even on the 25th, the day after the unprecedented ‘removal from the attorney general duties’, President Moon and the Blue House have not responded at all. President Moon’s silence is expected to continue until the disciplinary proceedings of the Ministry of Justice are completed, and it appears that the interior of the Blue House has received a Hamgu order.
In politics, one analysis says that President Moon, who was a former attorney, prioritized legal proceedings and therefore kept deliberate silence. This is because under current law, the authority of the president can only emerge after the disciplinary procedure of the Ministry of Justice against ‘Prosecutor Yoon Seok-yeol’ is completed.
According to the Prosecutor’s Disciplinary Law, the Minister of Justice may request disciplinary action against the Attorney General, and types of disciplinary action include dismissal, dismissal, suspension, reduction, and reprimand. After deliberation, the Disciplinary Committee decides on the disciplinary action with the approval of the majority of the attending members. If a disciplinary action of more than one reduction in salary is decided, the President will ‘execute’ at the request of the Minister of Justice. The “president’s time” begins only after the discipline is resolved.
From here arises the logic that the passport defends the silence of the president, which marks the day for the opposition party to “coward.” Park Ju-min, a member of the Democratic Party, said on the day: “If the disciplinary committee decides, if the disciplinary committee asks the president for a provision beyond suspension, the president will decide.” You don’t need to talk out loud about whether it’s acceptable at this stage. ”
viewer
On the one hand, some analyzes say that President Moon gave Yoon his ‘last chance’ to decide where to go. This is deeply related to the public message from Blue House spokesman Kang Min-seok that the president received an advance report.
In such a sensitive matter, the fact that the Blue House, which has strict security, revealed that the President had received a related report the day before could mean that ‘munsim (文 心) was reflected in this disciplinary proceeding. Democratic Party leader Lee Nak-yeon, who recently revealed the fact of his monopoly with President Moon, urged President Yoon to “choose his own city” after the message from the Blue House. An official in the passport analyzed that “I think Lee may have done what the president wanted to say.”
On the same day, a member of the Democratic Party, Sang-ho Woo, the core of the passport, said: “Is there no reason to announce that the Blue House received a report from Minister Chu Mi-ae and did not respond?” He gave me an implicit opportunity to stand up, and I think so. “He added:” If I give him the opportunity to resign in the first place, and if he persists in not resigning until the end, I think the president should be removed at the right time. ”
viewer
However, criticism is flooding the opposition powers as to whether President Moon’s move and his passport is really a move to take “political responsibility” as a personal authority and ruling ruling party. President Moon and the ruling party, which praised Yoon as a “fair prosecutor,” hide behind the purview of the law and take no responsibility for personnel failures.
Representative Yoo Sang-beom, a member of the National Assembly Judicial Committee, said: “Even if the president has been silent until now, wouldn’t it be correct to express his intentions at this level?” It was not me who expelled the president, but Minister Chu Mi-ae, are you trying to say this?
/ Reporter Yoon Hong-woo and Lim Ji-hoon [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >
