[ad_1]
The conflict over the high-ranking officials criminal investigation agency (airborne agency) has increased. As the work of recommending candidates for the chief of the airlift was unfavorable, the Korean Democratic Party revised the law and declared that it would issue a candidate regardless of whether the opposition party agreed or not. The deadline for reviewing the law was proposed on the 3rd of the following month. The force of the people opposes the attempt to reform the law by addressing the over-the-counter struggle. If the ruling party advances with the power of Ui Suk-soo, the opposition of the opposition party will inevitably stop crying.
Conflict amplified by violating the promise of ‘guaranteed opposition party’
The unconstitutional controversy cannot be enforced without clarifying
It is contrary to the fact that the popular power, which considers that the airborne agencies created in accordance with the laws in force are contrary to the constitution, participated in the process of recommending candidates for the air bridge leadership. However, the power of the people to nominate candidates was due to the political burden of the “total boycott.” Also, although the opposition party was forced to do so, it had to seize that opportunity if the ruling party really wanted to launch the air defense agency early because it participated in the recommendation work of the head of the air defense department. Whether they agreed with the candidate proposed by the opposition party or obtained consent by proposing to a person that no one can object to, they should have seen the end. However, after meeting twice, he suddenly criticized “the power of the people is dragging time” and canceled the recommendation work. Then, as if they had been waiting, they began to change the law.
Furthermore, if the air transport law is changed as the Democratic Party wants, the opposition party cannot play a role in appointing the chief of the airlift. Last year, when the media, law and academia criticized that “the airborne agency will become the government’s escort organization,” the Blue House and the ruling party said: “I will give the opposition party the despotism”. The veto is the minimum device to ensure the political neutrality of the airlift. However, today he speaks calmly of the need to appoint the chief of the airlift, excluding the opposition party. In addition, the amendment to the law issued by the Democratic Party has provisions on toxins, such as increasing the basic term of prosecutors in the airlift from 3 to 7 years. Touching the mandate is enough to defraud the suspicion that even if the regime changes, the people of the current ruling party are trying to take control of the airlift.
The issue of the airlift becomes more acute because it is possible that the type of airlift that the current regime wants will turn into an unconstitutional organization. Many academics and lawyers argue that it is against the Constitution that the airlift is designed so that it does not belong to any of the legislative, administrative and judicial areas, and that the investigation is directed only to public officials of a certain class or higher. Consequently, the Future Integration Party (current popular power) in February and a group of legal professionals filed a request for an unconstitutional trial in the Constitutional Court in May. The Constitution plays a role in the early resolution of national conflicts based on the Constitution. The constitution, which ended the presidential impeachment in three months, has maintained this issue for 10 months. It is difficult for the ruling party to push the airlift without the constitution of the constitution in any direction. I hope for a quick decision.
[ad_2]
