[ad_1]
[앵커]
To receive Chun Doo-hwan’s unpaid surcharge, the prosecution turned over Jeon’s house in Yeonhui-dong for a short sale. The court canceled the seizure of the main house and gardens after accepting some of the former’s allegations that these measures were illegal. This is reporter Han Dong-oh. This is the house in Yeonhui-dong, Seoul, where Chun Doo-hwan lives. The main building is in the name of his wife, Soon-ja Lee, the unit is the daughter-in-law, and the garden is in the name of the secretary. The prosecution saw the house as Mr. Jeon’s middle name property and, after seizing it in 2018 to recover the additional surcharge, it was turned over to a short sale. The nominees filed an objection, claiming it was unfair, and the Seoul High Court accepted some of the allegations and canceled the seizure of the main building and garden. The judiciary decided that the main house and capacity were acquired before Mr. Jeon’s presidency and were not “illegal properties”. The Civil Service Offenses Forfeiture Act allows confiscation and collection only of illegal profits or property derived from illegal profits, so it is not possible to confiscate “property under name” instead of “illegal property”. However, the court explained that if the house is included in the ‘nominated property’, the owner can change the owner’s name in front of Mr. Jeon through civil lawsuits and then carry out additional punishment. On the other hand, for the seizure of the premises, the court rejected Mr. Jeon’s objection as legal. His brother-in-law acquired a separate house in 2003 with the bribery funds prepared for Mr. Jeon’s possession, and his daughter-in-law, who was abroad, took over the property despite learning of the “illegal property” situation. . Mr. Jeon said that he regretted the fact that the issue of additional fines made the public uncomfortable, but evaluated the court’s decision as declaring the principle of a rule of natural law. On the other hand, the prosecution has already recognized that all family members, including Mr. Jeon’s eldest son, have acknowledged that this is the nominated property and said that it was the property that they would actively cooperate in the redemption, and that they would file an appeal closely analyzing the court decision. If the prosecution’s immediate appeal is made, the seizure of Yeonhui-dong’s home will stand until a Supreme Court decision is made. The house has already been auctioned for 5.137 million won through a short auction, but the related proceeding has been suspended since the request for stay of execution was accepted in the ‘Cancellation of Auction Disposition’ filed by Mr. Jeon. Apart from this court decision, a trial is underway in the Seoul Administrative Court to decide whether to cancel the auction provision. The surcharge Chun Doo-hwan did not pay is still close to 100 billion won. With this court decision, it seems inevitable that there will be a setback in the recovery of Mr. Jeon’s remaining surcharges. YTN Han Dong-oh[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
