[ad_1]
Lee Nak-yeon, together with the representative of the Democratic Party, proposed to President Moon Jae-in to pay 20,000 won for communications to citizens over the age of 13, and the final decision was made at an emergency economic meeting chaired by President Moon on Day 10. It was revised when criticism arose after the report that it was reviewing the proposal to pay only people aged 17 to 34 and over 50. There are voices of skepticism as to whether it is appropriate for the nature of disaster support and whether there are standards for government disaster support. Why is the government criticized for providing support?
Is it correct for the purpose of disaster support?
First, it is criticized that support for communication costs does not fit the nature of disaster support. The title of Hankyoreh’s editorial on the 10th was “Twenty thousand won discount on communication costs for disaster support, okay.” The newspaper criticized: “It does not coincide with the purpose of the second disaster support fund, which has decided to select and provide concentrated support for those who have been affected by the crown crisis.”
“This money, which is close to 1 trillion won, is not released to the market, but it is completely blocked at the news agency.” It is difficult for the Justice Party to approve the budget as it is ”. CEO Shim said: “Support for the self-employed, which should be thick, is too little and support for communication spending for the public is too weak.” “I strongly request that the payment of 20,000 won for communication expenses be reconsidered.”
One of the reasons for the objection to the national distribution of disaster subsidies is that the effect of stimulating consumption on the first disaster subsidy was not adequately evaluated. However, support for communication costs is inevitably less effective in boosting consumption than primary subsidy. Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myeong said in an interview on KBS radio that day: “Since the money goes directly to the telecommunications company, there is no multiplier effect, so it is difficult to expect the effect of increasing sales in the alleys of the neighborhood. ” The multiplier effect refers to the effect of generating an aggregate demand that is several times greater than the money released by expanded financing that leads to effective demand and consumption.
Regarding the cost of communication, as civic groups such as Participation Solidarity have argued, the burden on citizens can be alleviated through government regulation of mobile operators, such as disclosure of communication costs and cost adequacy analysis. Communication.
There are also criticisms of financial investment in mobile phone operators that make stable profits through monopoly. Participación Solidaria said on the 10th: “The operating profit of the three mobile telecommunications companies in the first half of the year, when the entire country suffered from the coronavirus, was 1,683.4 trillion won, an increase of 9.7%. compared to the same period last year ”. At least half of them are paid by the three mobile phone operators, and it is correct to reduce the exemption on your own. ”
The purpose of selective payment in consultation with the opposition party is colorless
Representative Lee Nak-yeon reached a consensus with the leadership of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance and the Popular Forces on selective payment, and the reason for gathering positions through selective payment was to provide support to the most vulnerable.
This support for communication costs does not fit this purpose. They also criticized the power of people who shared their position on disaster subsidies. In a comment on the 10th, spokesperson Kim Eun-hye said: “When financially selective payment is unavoidable, and now, it is actually a support for communication expenses for the whole country, but it is different then, it is a fund disaster support. “I ask for a deep reflection on the recognition and approach to people in the marginal situation, if they are going to pay 7 trillion of national debt for the sake of.
35-49 years subtracted and placed, cadastral cadastral map
At a meeting of the party’s high-ranking administration on the 6th, mockery and criticism emerged when reports came out that they were discussing support for communications spending, excluding those aged 35-49. The confusion was compounded by the question of whether the 35-49-year-old supports the government, so there is no need for support. Then after three days, it switched to nationwide support.
In an editorial, the Hankyoreh noted: “As I watch the process of removing middle-aged from the target audience and returning it, I am not only suspicious of support, but also concerned that the serious disaster situation, such as the crisis of the crown, be caricatured. ” Chosun Ilbo also criticized in an editorial that day, saying: “To alleviate the dissatisfaction of the people who have been left out of the projection support, we will also give hundreds of billions of free money.”
The government suspects that there are standards for disaster support
The government can make a selection or a universal judgment. In the process, it is important to persuade political forces or people to disagree and explain the effect of the policy. In addition to countermeasures to support communication expenses, the ‘entertainment movement’ shown in the decision process for the second disaster grant raised doubts as to whether the government is adequately diagnosing the difficulties or evaluating the government’s finances.
Representative Shim Sang-jeong insisted on the national payment of the disaster support fund, saying, “It is a matter that timely payments should be made before Chuseok, but it is doubtful that this is possible.” This is because the assessment will take a long time if you determine your income and apply for it.
In the case of the second disaster grant, the government said it would determine support based on sales, not the income of the self-employed. In an example reported by Hankyoreh, in the case of a commercial operator operating an online shopping center that closed in step 2.5 of social distancing and an online shopping center that was not affected by the crown, despite the fact that overall revenue increased, PC room sales fell sharply, so they can receive subsidies. .
This is evidence that there was insufficient consideration and preparation for additional support methods after the first disaster support payment was paid. In this context, it is answered that the communication cost support policy is also an absurd policy.
Some point out that the projection and the universal debate are obscured. LAB2050 CEO Lee Won-jae told Facebook: “The problem of the disaster support fund was not ‘selective payment or universal payment’, as everyone’s misunderstanding (or willful misunderstanding), but ‘how much to raise and how much share’. The second round is expected to drop to 7 trillion won. It was an empty reason to give large payments to those who needed it. “” People who collect less and share less won, and those who collect more and share more lose. ”
It is noted that the government has not devised financial measures to persuade those concerned about fiscal soundness, and has reduced the size of the secondary subsidy, arguing that “support for selection increases protection of the vulnerable.” It has become a policy that has been criticized for giving.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
