[ad_1]
On the 13th a photo was uploaded to the Internet community. This is a scene of 10 people who want to see a private house in front of an apartment door in Gangseo-gu, Seoul. This is because, as the right to request contract renewal and roof system for jeon and monthly rent were implemented, it became the star of the sky to search for jeonse. Finally, the contractor for the concession of this house was decided by lottery. There is also a condition that unconditionally meets the tenant’s current move-in date.
Hong Nam-gi, unable to find a private home, becomes the target of ridicule
Symbolic example of countermeasure 23
Make it an opportunity to experience the paradox of politics
After the photo became a hot topic, someone put the face of Hong Nam-ki, Deputy Prime Minister of Economy and Minister of the Ministry of Strategy and Finance, in line with the photo. Vice Premier Hong recently received an eviction request from a privately owned house in Mapo, Seoul, and is contrary to the fact that he has not yet obtained a new one. Another “laugh” thing happened. There is a risk that the sale of a house in Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi-do, owned by Vice Premier Hong, a tenant and owner, will be lost. This is because the tenant exercised the right to request the renewal of the contract. Initially, when he sold the Sejong City pre-sale rights, he was able to remove the ‘Second Home Owner’ tag, but was unable to sell due to resale restrictions.
The government emphasizes the good intentions of real estate policy. However well intentioned the policy may be, if the result is a hindrance to life, on the contrary, no one can applaud. It is a paradox of politics. Vice Premier Hong’s “Can’t Buy, Sell, Own or Jeonse” from Vice Premier Hong, the real estate policy control tower, is a symbolic example of how stupidly the current government’s 23rd real estate policy was implemented.
Every time a policy was issued, there were always side effects, but the government asked people to live and have hope, saying that instead of modifying the policy, stricter regulations were needed. On the 12th, Vice Premier Hong told an executive meeting of the Ministry of Science and Technology: “If necessary, additional countermeasures should be devised to the monthly rental market and jeon.”
The policy of filling in the hole only creates another hole. No country has universal regulations for the entire population to solve specific problems. The fact that the entire mortgage loan was affected by the price of Gangnam’s house led to a “panic buy” in the 1930s. The Lease Protection Act, which protects tenants, increased the rent per rental and created a cliff for rent. It would not be government logic that the pain of reality can be ignored by the “good” target.
Unfortunately, it is fortunate that Vice Premier Hong became a refugee for everyone. I hope it serves as an opportunity to arrogantly consult that only my convictions are correct. There is also the expectation that the side effects of the policy paradox will feel like “my problem.” At the 8th meeting of ministers related to the inspection of the real estate market held on the 14th, Vice Premier Hong said: “We accept the difficulties of those looking for a new private home.” I hope you are serious.
Sejong = Reporter Kim Namjun [email protected]
[ad_2]