[ad_1]
[앵커]
With the first senior officials’ criminal investigation bureau confirmed with 11 candidates, the ruling and opposition parties are in full swing. While the Democratic Party emphasized that the prosecution candidates recommended by the People’s Power are inappropriate as heads of the airlift, The force of the people clashed with the Democratic Party, who recommended former judges, saying that investigative experience is important. Connect with reporters from the National Assembly. Reporter Song Jae-in! As soon as the preliminary candidate for the chief of the airlift is confirmed, it seems that war begins. Yes, first of all, starting with the first 11 officially announced candidates, Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae recommended Jeon Hyun-jung, a former judge. The former lawyer was a former judge at the Seoul Central District Court, and in 2015, it is known that he became interested in human rights issues, such as deciding to recognize national damages against the Hansen people. Choi Woon-sik, recommended by the Minister of Court Administration, Cho Jae-yeon, is a person who served as the head of the joint investigation team of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. In 2011, while investigating corruption in a savings bank, former president Lee Myung-bak’s brother Lee Sang-deuk and former lawmaker Lee Sang-deuk were brought to trial. The Democratic Party’s recommendation committee recommended two former judges, including lawyer Kwon Dong-joo and lawyer Jeon Jong-min. On the other hand, the recommending members of the People’s Power side recommended four high-ranking prosecutors, including lawyer Kang Chan-woo, lawyer Kim Kyung-soo, lawyer Seok Dong-hyun, and lawyer Son Ki-ho. In addition, Kim Jin-wook, Principal Investigator of the Constitutional Court recommended by the Korean Bar Association, Lee Geon-ri, Vice Chairman of the National Rights Commission, and Han Myung-gwan, lawyers, were appointed. Above all, the candidates recommended by opposition parties are in stark contrast to former judges and prosecutors, and this has already started a nervous war between the opposition parties. A Democratic Party official insisted in a call with YTN that it would be inappropriate for a person with the supreme vision of a prosecutor to become the chief of the airlift, where reform is the key to the institutions of power. Furthermore, since the indictment is also included in the indictment, the former prosecutor for the prosecution noted that the “involvement around my family” type of investigation could be repeated. The side of the popular power immediately refuted criticism of the “exclusion of the prosecution.” In a call with the YTN, the nominating committee of candidates for Minister of Public Transport in the People’s Power insisted that the Ministry of Public Affairs should accept the accusation rather than take away the right to investigate. As the Air Ministry is an investigative agency in the end, it is argued that the experience of investigating in existing investigative agencies, such as the prosecution, is important, and that the person who can understand this should become the chief of the airlift. . In the end, the battle over preliminary candidates for the chief of the airlift is turning into controversy with the prosecution. The prosecution’s controversy over the costs of special activities continues today Yes, but today it seems that karate has changed. Previously, the Democratic Party and Minister Choo Mi-ae sparked controversy over Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s use of special activity expenses and even promoted on-site verification. As for the special activity fee, there is no need to reveal specific details, so Yun can abuse it as personal political funds. However, after yesterday looking at the details of the execution in the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, today the people’s power went on strike by raising a controversy over the cost of the special activity of Minister Choo Mi-ae and the Ministry of Justice. The power of the people Joo Ho-young, the head of the house, raised the issue of expenses for special activities, but during the field investigation, the Ministry of Justice criticized that verification had been interfered with without providing adequate data. At the same time, he even used the expression “crazy strategy” towards Minister Chu. The Ministry of Justice said that, in principle, the expenses of special activities are not allowed and insisted that the Ministry of Justice must check in all directions whether illegally paid for special activities, even during the time of Minister Cho, the former Minister Cho Kook and former Minister Park Sang-hee. The Ministry of Justice specified the core of the controversy over the costs of special activities, even mentioning the review of the special commission for the investigation of state affairs. The Democratic Party announced yesterday that the verification was insufficient due to insufficient data after the on-site inspection of the special activity expenses of the prosecution. Until now we have refrained from expressing official positions. YTN Song Jae-in in the National Assembly so far[[email protected]]it is.
