[ad_1]
[앵커]
The air defense identification zone, which is set over a wider area to prepare for the danger of invading airspace, and nearby power plants are problematic. Similar things have happened recently, the military explained that there was no invasion of airspace and that China gave advance notice. Is it different from the unauthorized entry above? These are FactW and Jungkyu Kang. 19 Sino-Russian bombers and fighters appearing in groups over the Korean peninsula. We traveled not only to Dokdo, our homeland, but also to Kyushu and Okinawa, Japan, where the American military bases are located. It is provocative coalition training similar to last July, but what changed is that there was advance warning from China. ▲ Chinese ‘advance notice’ … Not unauthorized? Since the ROK-China defense strategy dialogue, which resumed five years after the THAAD conflict, the attitude has changed, raising expectations. However, it was the answer to the question about our army’s purpose of flight. There is also a limitation that was the wireless communication through a direct line just before entering Cádiz. This is a formal notification well below national legal standards, such as the submission of advance flight plans and continuous monitoring. ▲ Russia had no ‘advance notice’ … “I followed international law”? It does not even recognize Cádiz because it has not established an air defense identification zone. Unlike airspace, air defense identification zones are not based on international law, so prior notification cannot be enforced. That is why Russia, which invaded Dokdo airspace last year and discovered it, can reiterate the claim that it has “compliant international law” again. YTN Kang Jeong-gyu[[email protected]]is.
The first time the Chinese army, which had been in and out of KADIZ, gave advance notice in October last year.
Russia did not even have this formal notice.
