[정치][출발새아침] Park Yong-jin “Yoo Seung-min with multiple households, I don’t understand the urgency of public rental housing”



[ad_1]

* The text below may differ from the actual content of the broadcast, so please check the broadcast for more accurate information.

◇ Host Kim Woo-sung (hereinafter Kim Woo-sung): There are many rumors both inside and outside the political sphere about President Moon Jae-in’s statements about his visit to the public rental housing site. Among them, he was the one who warmed up the weekend through a social media workshop with former legislator Yoo Seung-min. Also, the representative of the Democratic Party. Good Morning.

◆ Park Yong-jin, member of the Democratic Party (hereinafter Park Yong-jin): Yes, hello.

◇ Woosung Kim: It was last Saturday. You said: “It is a political distortion. It is not the attitude of the candidates for the presidential elections.”

◆ Park Yong-jin: Representative Seung-min Yoo was a candidate for the presidential election and was trying to become president. However, these types of people are giving up on the public rental housing policy and their dream of building a home. Saying this is a serious political distortion. I think. At that time, the Dongtan rental apartment complex that President Moon Jae-in visited was also made by inheriting the happy housing policy that President Park Geun-hye had made. However, the role of the State to ensure comfortable housing for people is still maintained under article 35, paragraph 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea, be it the previous or current regime, and after putting this policy In my commitment, it is now my home. Asking him to give up his dream of preparation is not the attitude of a person seeking to become a national leader because deliberate speaking is a serious political distortion. I think you should apologize for this part as well, and more seriously, you rent yourself publicly. The rental apartment I said like this Isn’t there yet 1.57 million people, or about 5 million people? The people who live there, the mothers and the children cook and eat, and they despise the people who live in those houses where the elderly couples warmly continue their lives. In the past, Congressman Jeong Tae-ok, who belongs to the people’s force, used the word Lee Bumangcheon to hurt people. I think this is Lee Bu-mang-cheon’s version of Yoo Seung-min, but I don’t know what is different. It is degrading and insulting to our people, who are about 5 million people who live in rental housing and wait for people who want to move despite a competition rate of 100: 1. I think so. This doesn’t really qualify as a national leader, so I think I should apologize for this as well. People and our people live there right now. But in that way, I don’t know if they don’t understand the effectiveness of public rental housing and the desperation of public rental housing, but I think it’s a huge political mistake and I hope to formally apologize for that.

◇ Kim Woo-sung: Indeed, even innocent children were made fun of and demeaning while living in this public rental housing was reported in the news, but politicians pointed out that there is a real problem with comments in this regard. People live. The expression is very basic and based on the constitution, and those who insist on critical public opinion of the government are more confined than alive. Because, does rental housing make sense as a base to stabilize the price of the house or prepare a better house? How would you also refute this criticism?

◆ Park Yong-jin: About that opinion, Eun-san Jo gave me that expression. It is no different from me. Eunsan Jo also liked her experience. I liked my experience living in public rental housing. You express yourself. However, the important thing is that both are two-wheeled policies to guarantee the right to live in the people, as well as a two-headed car for the housing restrictions of the people specified in article 35, paragraph 3 of the Constitution. , which I mentioned earlier. There are many citizens who have not even had the opportunity to rent an apartment, and there are many citizens who want to live there, and there are many citizens living there. The stability of the real estate market, which is called price stability, should be played out together, but I don’t think it is contradictory or contradictory.

◇ Woosung Kim: This real estate policy is taxed by the current government. The market itself is out of control and real estate problems are emerging in Seoul and Busan. Given that the president of the president participated, I believe that the legislator will have an opinion on what the government should do on this real estate issue in the future.

◆ Park Yong-jin: I apologize for the instability of the housing market, which is causing controversies at the national level, and because you are restless. I believe that the failure of the housing supply policy is the main cause. And after that, it is necessary to admit that the effect of the government’s response was also very small, but as I mentioned earlier, we must focus on the stability of people’s right to housing. I don’t think there is a need for government policy to focus too much on receiving apartments in the Gangnam 3 district. As of now, the housing occupancy rate in the metropolitan area is only 50%. This is, on the contrary, 50% of the people live on a rental basis. However, there is a research report that shows that tenants pay about a fifth of their income in the form of monthly rent. So, as I mentioned earlier, I think it is necessary to increase disposable income and allow time for certain assets to be saved through a residential ladder policy called rental housing, and the supply of pre-sale housing must also be increased. The government is killing 1.27 million homes in the metropolitan area through the 8.4 measures, and I think it should be able to lead a double-headed wagon for housing stability in this way.

◇ Woosung Kim: Yes, not only suppressing the demand but also expanding the supply. He is saying that harmony between the two is necessary, but there are many problems, but we will see. Let’s change our mood for a moment and talk about the revision of the Airborne Law. It means that the Democratic Party will launch within this year, but the force of the people is fighting public opinion as an obstructionist. How are you seeing

◆ Park Yong-jin: But if you think of obstructionism, I will guarantee you unlimited obstructionism. Even when I said that, I was upset and angry at the People’s Strength members. I wonder if these people were also hoping to end the discussion because the unlimited discussion was not effective. I think it’s a corona crisis. Wouldn’t the public find it awkward to repeat pointless arguments over and over? I thought, so why don’t we go ahead with the conclusion of the debate quickly and hold an extraordinary National Assembly to focus on national tasks like crown prevention measures? It’s an idea.

◇ Kim Woo-sung: However, the longest filibuster, this kind of thing has attracted attention.

◆ Yongjin Park: I’m not sure what that means. If you had 12 hours to read a book, wouldn’t it last longer if you read three or four books? However, I hope you can think about what it means.

◇ Woosung Kim: Yes, I see. Tomorrow, President Yoon Seok-yeol’s Disciplinary Committee will be held again. How is the mood in the Democratic Party?

◆ Park Yong-jin: The procedure established by the law is in progress, and it is in progress according to the laws and regulations, so I hope politicians do not intervene. This is my opinion.

◇ Kim Woo-sung: In fact, there are still controversies about the procedural legitimacy of the formation of the disciplinary committee and the disciplinary committee of the Ministry of Justice.

◆ Yongjin Park: Aren’t President Seok-yeol Yoon and his lawyers sufficiently exercising their defense and defense rights in the dispute? I think I’m just watching the process. I don’t think it’s helpful for politicians to talk about it.

◇ Kim Woo-sung: Yes, we have to keep our distance from the political world. He said he would run for president. It is not a generational change, but a change of era. In fact, they call you Generation X. Can you tell us the reason and background for the decision, including the changing times?

◆ Park Yong-jin: I have been worried about the possibility of running for the presidency for a long time, and the politics is too old and out of date. Research has to change. I think. So I think young and honest people must first be brave. Also, my parents’ generation was hopeful for the future. If you work hard, you can live well. But is there so much hope for our generation of young people in 2030? Currently in Korea. The sense of crisis that the dynamism of the Republic of Korea is fading has begun to weigh on our society, and there is concern that the 2030 generation will become the first generation that cannot live better than their parents. The reason the dynamism is disappearing is that the created powers expect the ROK to continue as it is now. This is because there are created powers in all parts of society, and if we need a courageous politician who can speak out about change against the vested interests of our society, I am thinking of recognizing that role. I would like to lead the creation of an exciting Republic of Korea where the 2030s and younger generations are excited about hope.

◇ Kim Woo-sung: Yes, since he spoke a lot about vested interests, he has been evaluated as a member of the Soshin faction, and he has experience in various progressive parties, but now the relationship between the progressive party and the ruling party is a bit awkward . In particular, I have withdrawn from this Fair Trade Law. There is also regrettable criticism for these parts, how do you see it?

◆ Park Yong-jin: Not only I, but also many members of our party regretted the passage of the backward Fair Trade Law and the three backward amendments to the law, and made enough criticism in internal discussions. There is. These are all laws that arise out of concerns that our economy is still being built around created powers, chaebols and large corporations, and that they are wasting the energy of economic innovation. I believe that young politicians should lead the transition from the chaebol era to the era of innovative entrepreneurs. The young generation I mentioned above is an exciting Republic of Korea. In economics, I think it is necessary to create a system full of energy for innovative startups. For me, Park Yong-jin has the temperament of a cheerleader who supports people’s passion and energy. I think. We must take the initiative and play a role so that Korean politics can radiate new energy. I have to do the voice I need. I’m thinking.

◇ Kim Woo-sung: Yes, Corona 19’s situation is very serious right now. You have chosen the role of cheerleader and you must also show leadership in the political world.

◆ Park Yong-jin: As I said earlier, I have expressed some reformed voices on economic issues due to the economic democratization of chaebol reforms, and also in relation to educational reform and social reform. In the future, the political world must show such reforms and dynamics of change. We will take the lead in creating voices and opportunities for change by the governing party of government, and we will continue to strive and strengthen our role as politicians who put people first.

◇ Woosung Kim: Yes, I will listen to today’s message. Thank you.

◆ Yongjin Park: Thank you.

◇ Kim Woo-sung: Until now, it was Park Yong-jin from the Democratic Party.

[ad_2]