[ad_1]
Efforts to exercise defensive power have been facilitated, but many of the previous testimonies on “inflating the specification”
Professor Kyung-Shim Jeong (57), who is being tried on suspicion of a child’s private entrance exam and private equity funds, is released on the 10th and tried on the 14th.
Professor Jeong said: “It is difficult to discuss 10 years in the detention state.
According to the court on the 10th, the Seoul Central District Court 25-2 Criminal Settlement Division (Director Jung-Yeop Lim) invited Professor In-Seop Han of Seoul National University as a witness and questioned the suspicion of a False inmate of the daughter’s Jomo Center for Public Law on Human Rights. On this day, the trial was the first trial Professor Chung received for disability. In the latest trial, testimony came out that “an internal confirmation is false”, and attention was focused on how a teacher would testify. Lastly, the judges department convened a person in charge of admissions matters at the Graduate School of Medicine and the Witness Newspaper on the 28th of this month.
The judiciary will have a witness newspaper related to the teachers of private capital and destruction of evidence for a month from next month. The court will call Jo Bum-dong’s niece, Jo Bum-dong (37), who ran the family’s family fund as the first witness. As a key witness to the suspicion of private equity, a fierce workshop is expected.
There are three main charges that Mr. Cho is intertwined with Professor Chung. Mr. Cho △ signed a bogus consulting contract to guarantee a minimum return on investment, paid 150 million won to Professor Chung, reported falsely reported changes in the investment of the former Cho family member to the Financial Services Commission and △ on the appointment of the former minister. He is accused of joining the data related to Professor Chung’s investment. Mr. Cho admitted that he participated in the destruction of some evidence at his trial. The Court of Justice also called witness Kim Mi-kyung (45), Blue House Secretary for Balanced Personnel, who served as head of the new team at the time of the previous personnel matters hearing.
In the legal world, when the court decided not to issue additional orders, Professor Chung was found to be advantageous in terms of exercising defensive power. Professor Chung said in the previous interrogation on bail and arrest: “Human memory is not enough to remember work 15 years ago.” Examine the vast data provided by the prosecution and check for any misinterpretation and find any missing evidence. He insisted that Professor Chung must be released to pay.
However, there are also opinions that the impact of the release will be limited since some of the testimonies supporting the entrance examination situation were issued in the previous trial. Seo Cho-dong, a lawyer, said: “The fact that the court released Professor Jeong and said: ‘The evidence is unlikely to be destroyed at the end of the investigation of the evidence’ means that they have formed some degree of psychosis. in that part. ” Meanwhile, many witnesses in the Witness newspaper said that Professor Jeong was involved in the false intern confirmation and “inflated his daughter’s specifications.”
Professor Chung, who was arrested on October 24 of last year, was released on arrest 10 at the Seoul Detention Center in Uiwang-si, Gyeonggi Province, on 10.
By Joo-young Yoon, reporter [email protected]
Empathy is possible even when you’re offline
[ad_2]
