[ad_1]
On the 14th, the prosecution charged Democratic Party legislator Yoon Mi-hyang and A (45), director of the Justice Memory Coalition without embezzlement, applying eight counts of embezzlement, insisting that “most of the allegations raised were not a problem”. . Many of the suspicions raised by the media were included as the prosecution indicated six crimes (eight counts) in the complaint, but Eui-yeon Eui-yeon accepted the results of the investigation as “ the conclusion that the majority of they weren’t troublesome. ”
On the 15th, Eui-yeon Eui-yeon announced the statement on her website. Eui-yeon Eui-yeon said: “(As a result of the investigation), it has been discovered that most of the allegations of accounting fraud are not a legal problem. We urge the media to take a responsible attitude towards false reports.” Regarding the eight charges that the prosecution found guilty, he said: “I express my regret for the forced prosecution of the prosecution and for a proper prosecution.”
The previous day, the Seoul Western District Prosecutor’s Office announced the results of the investigation in which it applied eight charges (six criminal acts) to Representative Yoon and Director Eui-yeon Eui-yeon. Many of the suspicions previously raised by the media were also revealed in the prosecution’s investigation.
▲ Counselor Yoon charged with embezzlement of ’embezzlement’ of personal utility of a total of KRW 135,000,000 from a donation received through a personal account and an account created with the operating expenses of the Mapo shelter ▲ A ‘scam’ he received a total of 79.2 million KRW donated 9 times from insane grandmother Gil Won-ok ‘Suspicion ▲ Suspicion of’ violation of Public Sanitation Control Act ‘that an Anseong shelter was set up for victims of comfort women , loaned more than 50 times to local civic groups and political parties ▲ Suspicion of ‘displacement’ from buying an Anseong shelter at high prices without sufficient review ▲ Government / local governments The charge of ‘fraud’ for receiving fraudulently 367,500,000 won in misleading subsidies ▲ The “ Donation Law violation ” allegation in which approximately 4.27 billion won was raised through a group account that was not registered with the aut competent authority and a personal account of Assemblyman Yoon.
Jeong Eui-yeon argued that the accusations were “mere activities”. Eui-yeon Eui-yeon said: “It is difficult to understand that the prosecution of an activist who has dedicated his life to the movement to solve the problem of Japanese military ‘comfort women’ and carried out legitimate activities in accordance with the procedures stipulated by internal laws and regulations, etc. She refuted by saying: “The sublime behavior of the victims was regarded as the behavior of the ‘old man with dementia'”.
Following this, Eui-yeon Eui-yeon said, “There is no way to help lament that some outlets that have produced fake news are selling it again in the framework of ‘prosecuting most of the allegations raised.’ Some of the suspicions raised by the media were not confirmed by the prosecution.
As a result of the prosecution’s investigation, it is true that Representative Yoon embezzled 100 million won, but there was no evidence that Jeong Daehyup spent money on his daughter’s school expenses or on the purchase of the apartment. The prosecution found it difficult to admit that he was guilty because it is true that he actually worked as a manager for the registry of Yun’s biological father as the manager of the shelter. For the 3.7 billion won that Jeong Dae-hyeop and Jeong Eui-yeon omit from the accounting disclosure, they said, “There are no penalties under current law.” The suspicion that Eui-yeon Eui-yeon led a job to the Suwon Civic Newspaper run by Congressman Yoon’s wife was not prosecuted, saying: “The amount suggested by the Suwon Civic Newspaper among various companies is the cheapest.”
The following is the full text of Eui-yeon Jeong’s admission statement.
9.15 Statement of the Justice Solidarity Report on the announcement of the results of the investigation of the Prosecutor
On September 14, 2020, the prosecution announced the results of the investigation of the prosecution case related to the political association and justice. As a result, it turned out that most of the so-called “Eui-Yeon Jeong Accounting Corruption Suspicion”, which triggered the prosecution’s investigation, was not a legal issue. As it turned out that the allegations raised indiscriminately over the past four months, such as the ‘use of grants and donations’, are just unfounded arguments, once again we urge the media to take a responsible attitude towards false reports.
However, we express our regret at the prosecution’s forced prosecution and proper prosecution.
In particular, it is difficult to understand that the prosecution of an activist who has dedicated his life to the Japanese military movement for solving problems of comfort women and has carried out legitimate activities in accordance with the procedures established by the laws and internal regulations of the organization for violating the subsidy administration law, etc., is difficult to understand. Above all, we express our deep regret for the conspiracy to conspire even a dead person that is difficult to explain on its own, and to dismiss the noble actions of the surviving victims as “old people with dementia.” It is difficult to see only that there is an intention to fundamentally undermine the activities of victims who have become human rights activists, as well as the movement to solve the “comfort women” problem of the Japanese military.
Furthermore, he regrets that some of the mainstream media, which have produced fake news by putting an ‘accounting denial’ framework on a criminal group and turning various suspicions into facts, are selling Eui-yeon again under the framework of “most of the complaints raised “. There is no way to ban it.
As Eui-yeon Eui-yeon has already revealed several times, she has been making efforts to move forward in a future-oriented direction while inheriting the sublime spirit and history of the movement under the will of citizens and survivors from home and abroad. <성찰과비전위원회>And continue developing discussions through internal diagnosis and external consultation. We sincerely ask for unwavering support and solidarity in the future.
September 15, 2020
Justice Solidarity Memory
