[ad_1]
Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae has been silent for the ninth day on successive revelations by military officers and soldiers related to his son’s suspicion of the emperor’s leave. It is in contrast to the past, where he spoke without hesitation on matters of prosecution, real estate and media. In fact, every time he attended the National Assembly, he did not hesitate to have a tough war with opposition lawmakers. A representative comment is the speech “You write a novel” in the plenary session of the Judicial Legislative Commission of the National Assembly on July 27.
At that time, Representative Han-Hong Yoon of the People’s Power (the Future Integration Party) asked Deputy Justice Minister Koki-young, saying, “I was suddenly assigned a deputy minister while working as a prosecutor for the Eastern District. The minister Chu suddenly intervened and said: When Representative Yoon protested, “Is the member of the National Assembly a novelist?” Minister Chu did not back down and said, “You should ask a question similar to a question.”
Minister Chu was angered when the opposition party legislators asked him about “the suspicion of returning to his son’s vacation.”
At a meeting of the Judiciary Committee of the National Assembly on July 1, he said: “I think I live in a wonderful and wonderful world about disclosing my child’s personal information that I want to protect.” I am admiring him again. “” The boy is very angry, sad and crying, “he said,” do not touch him anymore. “Minister Chu’s statements that his 27-year-old son is crying this year became a parody in various forms in the online space, as the suspicion of the ’emperor’s holiday’ became more serious.
Regarding the suspicion of his son’s ’emperor’s vacation’, Minister Chu mainly counterattacked, saying that he was a ‘father-in-law’. It is interpreted to mean that the prosecution and the media unite to attack him and his son. At a meeting of the judicial committee of the National Assembly on 26 last month, Minister Chu said: “There are times when he did not respond relatively to other items on the agenda, but when questions about his son arose, he was enraged. He said, “Investigate now. Is it professed adherence? Is it a spectacular shake? I have to answer “one after another.
However, fellow soldiers and officers of the military unit who worked with her son “was actually deserted.” “Assistant Choo asked by phone for an extension of the vacation for the soldier (Minister Chu’s son).” “I received external pressure to select Minister Chu’s son as an interpreter. ”He began to be raised one after another. Members of the opposition judiciary, who exchanged battles with Minister Chu, also said: “As a controversy over the ’emperor’s license’ arises, the attitude of Minister Chu’s response seems to have softened somewhat in comparison. with the past. “
At the National Assembly Special Budget and Accounting Committee on the 1st, when Representative Yoo Sang-beom, an aide, asked, “Is there any fact that you have called the military unit?”, Minister Chu said: “I went to the army despite my son’s pain …” The answer is far from the point.
On the same day, when Representative Park Hyung-soo also questioned this, Minister Chu said, “There is no such fact. “What would the assistant do so that such a private matter receives instructions and (calls)?” However, even Democrat Kim Nam-guk, a member of the Democratic Party, said in a radio interview: “It seems true that Undersecretary Chu called for military unity.”
Earlier, Minister Chu was controversial for his oath directed at Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol as the cause of “reform of the prosecution service.” On June 25, at the Democratic Party’s first elected member innovation forum, President Yun noted, “The President is in command … I cut my instructions.” Prior to this, Minister Chu’s statements in the Judiciary Committee of the National Assembly in January that “the attorney general disobeyed my order” were criticized. The attorney general refers to the attorney general as a servant.
As house prices in Seoul soared, Minister Chu said, “The reason real estate (prices) soared was due to speculation,” he said. “After housewives in general, even the younger generation entered the ranks of speculation, and speculative sentiment spread socially like a plague.” He propelled housewives and young people who were anxious about the 23 failures of real estate policy as a ‘speculative force’. At the same time, Minister Chu said: “This (real estate problem) cannot be totally to blame for the government.”
