[ad_1]
Lawyers on the Korean side continue to argue, including submitting additional documents.
Yun Suk-yeol, you are still undecided whether to appear directly in questioning.
The 尹 side, the disciplinary committee’s policy to actively assert illegality and impropriety
[앵커]
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol repeatedly emphasized that the lawsuit targets the “disposition” of the president, but the defendant is the Minister of Justice. He drew the line that it was political to turn the passport into a defense against the president. Reporter Park Seo-kyung reports. Attorneys for Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who are about to be questioned on the 22nd to suspend the application of disciplinary effect, continued discussions over the weekend to present additional documents. The final decision is expected to be made in the morning of the day before or the day before, if President Yun will appear at the court hearing. It has been reported that Yoon left most of the lawsuits with lawyers and only received reports. In a call with YTN, Yoon’s defense attorney expressed concern that politicians will view the lawsuit as a protest against the president. “Protest” refers to opposing legitimate instructions, but this discipline is not just because there is a procedural problem itself. He also explained that it is a lawsuit against the presidential provision, but not against the President, and that the accused is also the Minister of Justice, not the President. He has repeatedly emphasized that the purpose of responding legally to the disciplinary procedures promoted by Minister Chu Mi-ae is unfair. In the previous questioning about the suspension of the exclusion from duties, President Yoon said that there was no procedure such as the disciplinary committee, and this time, he plans to actively highlight the illegality and injustice of the disciplinary committee. Although he has gone through the procedures stipulated by law, he is actually only fit. I didn’t think it was meant to legitimize the disciplinary action because it was formal. At the same time, we plan to argue that the composition of the disciplinary committee was biased and that the right to defense was not properly guaranteed, and even expectations of a proper procedure were broken. With the unprecedented disciplinary action of the acting attorney general and the confrontation between the president and the president, the focus is on the court’s decision to decide whether to return to the president. This is YTN Park Seo-kyung. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
