[ad_1]
[앵커]
If the disciplinary action against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol is taken tomorrow, it will be decided tomorrow. The second deliberation takes place in the morning and a fierce neurological warfare is expected tomorrow, as there are procedural issues such as the composition of the disciplinary committee and the method of questioning witnesses. I’ll connect the reporters. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung! What will be the procedure in President Yoon Suk-yeol’s Disciplinary Committee tomorrow? The second deliberation date of the Disciplinary Committee by President Yoon Suk-yeol will be held tomorrow at 10:30 am. An interrogation process is scheduled for eight Witnesses adopted last day. Unfortunately, the composition is divided into 4-4. Four people, including the Attorney General Han Dong-soo, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Lee Seong-yoon, the Gwangju District Attorney General Jin-woong Jeong, and Chief Prosecutor Shim Jae-cheol, They are among the people who will make a favorable statement to Minister Chu Mi-ae. On the other hand, Prosecutors Ryu Hyeok from the Ministry of Justice, Prosecutor Park Young-jin, Superintendent of the Ulsan District Prosecutor’s Office, Sohn Jun-sung, Chief Prosecutor and Prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa are expected to represent the position of President Yoon. The attendance of Supervisor Han Dong-soo, District Attorney Seong-yoon Lee, and Deputy District Attorney Jeong Jin-woong is uncertain, and other people are likely to attend. Prior to the full-scale questioning, the evasion resolution process is expected to continue. President Yoon Seok-yeol says that the disciplinary members who joined the disciplinary committee after the disciplinary claim should be excluded, and is expressing his willingness to request a challenge against Professor Jeong Han-jung, who served as the president’s representative. Depending on the circumstances, Vice Minister Yong-gu Yong-gu or Shin Sung-sik, head of the anti-corruption force, may also be challenged. The committee has a policy of completing all disciplinary resolutions tomorrow, but the meeting may continue depending on the circumstances. Professor Jeong Han-jung left room for another meeting to be held depending on the witnesses who do not appear and how long the questioning of the witnesses continues. President Yoon Suk-yeol, who was not present for the last date, is constantly struggling to attend the second date. Even after the first deadline, do the Disciplinary Committee and Chairman Yoon Seok-yeol continue to fight over procedural matters? Yes, the disciplinary committee consists of 7 members, including the president. Yoon’s side raised the question that if there was a vacancy, such as when the Minister of Justice, who is the disciplinary plaintiff, was removed from the post of president, a member of the preliminary committee should have been appointed to form the committee. Consequently, the deliberation on the 10th was illegal and invalidated, and a written statement was delivered to the disciplinary committee calling for the reorganization of the disciplinary committee with 7 members tomorrow. In addition, he asked the Ministry of Justice to disclose information on the composition of the preliminary members and the date of nomination, saying that it would verify whether the preliminary members named among the prosecutors were properly trained. On the other hand, the disciplinary committee has no problem. Professor Jeong Han-jung argued that the appointment of a preliminary member was not an obligation, but was at the discretion of the chairman, and that it was not necessary to appoint a preliminary member as most of the committee members were present and meeting the physicians quorum. The neurological warfare continues despite the witness questioning procedure. President Yoon Suk-yeol has strongly opposed the disciplinary committee’s position that only disciplinary members have the authority to ask questions. Professor Jeong Han-jung, who was emphasizing the principle, took a step back and said that he could give lawyers the authority to ask questions. He explained that if the number of questions is so high that it is difficult to ask, he may question the lawyer. In this way, since the first deadline, the two sides have been in fierce conflict in various places, so pain is expected in the deliberation process tomorrow. Until now, YTN Kang Hee-kyung at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office[[email protected]]is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
