[ad_1]
[앵커]
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s disciplinary committee will be held tomorrow. There are also observations that the conclusion may not be reached tomorrow as there are only 7 witnesses requested by President Yoon. On the controversial investigation of the controversial ‘Inspection of the Judge’, the nerves of the Great Swordsman and the Ministry of Justice continue. I’ll connect with reporters Reporter Kang Hee-kyung! Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s disciplinary committee is approaching the day before. Looks like it will open as scheduled, right? Yes, tomorrow at 10:30 am, the Disciplinary Commission of Prosecutors of the Ministry of Justice will deliberate on the disciplinary action against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. Yesterday, President Yoon Seok-yeol requested four additional witnesses, including Seoul Central District Prosecutor Lee Seong-yoon, Supreme Prosecutor Han Dong-soo, Gwangju District Attorney General Deputy Prosecutor Jeong Jin-woong , and an anonymous prosecutor. If you add up to 3 people, including Ryu Hyuk, an inspector from the Ministry of Justice who previously submitted the application, 7 people have come forward only as witnesses. The disciplinary committee will decide tomorrow during the deliberation process whether or not to adopt a witness. President Yoon’s request to evade the disciplinary committee is also expected to be made at the venue tomorrow. General Yoon’s policy is that if prosecutors close to Minister Chu, including Vice Minister of Justice Yong-gu Yong-gu, are nominated as members of the disciplinary committee, they will request the impeachment immediately. Accordingly, tomorrow the disciplinary committee will first decide whether or not to bypass the disciplinary committee, and witness adoption and cross-examination procedures will take place. The rejection is determined by the majority attendance of those registered and the approval of the majority of the attendees, and those who have received a rejection request cannot participate in the resolution. The hearing process begins in the morning, but is likely to last well into the afternoon. If the process is prolonged, including the adoption of all the witnesses, there is the possibility that another hearing will be held. It is known that there is a high possibility that Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol will not attend the disciplinary commission tomorrow due to procedural problems. Tensions are rising ahead of the first disciplinary commission for the attorney general. The Ministry of Justice drew a line in the equity controversy, saying that it will ensure that the right of the disciplinary accused to request evasion is guaranteed according to the procedure established by law, and that it will fully guarantee the procedural rights and the right to defense of those that nobody has enjoyed in the disciplinary process. In the midst of this, the nervous wars of the Great Swordsman and the Ministry of Justice continue on suspicion of a “judge’s inspection.” Has the Ministry of Justice already responded to the request for special inspection? Yes, yesterday morning, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office ordered the Seoul Supreme Prosecutor’s Office to investigate the suspicion of Yoon’s ‘Judge’s Inspection’ being carried out by the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. The main reason was that it was difficult to expect a fair investigation as a result of the investigation by the office of the Human Rights Policy Officer that confirmed violations of due process during the investigation of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office assigned the case to the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office and sent the case of President Yoon’s “existential abuse charges”, requested by the Ministry of Justice, to the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office. The fact-finding carried out by the Human Rights Policy Office is also carried out by the Seoul High Prosecutor’s Office, and all references to the investigation have been released. Then the Ministry of Justice immediately expressed its regret. After returning to the prosecutor’s office, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office intervened in the investigation through the Human Rights Policy Office and the investigation by prosecutors was stopped. They also argued that the order of the Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office to assign the case to the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office was not different from that of the President. Consequently, the background of the great kendo instruction was specifically explained and refuted again. The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office requested that a special prosecutor be appointed to ensure fairness, but the Ministry of Justice passively came out and inevitably assigned the case to the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office. The position of the Ministry of Justice on the request for special prosecutors has not yet come out. However, as there are observations that the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, may once again exercise investigative authority, the nervous war between the Justice Department and the Great Sword escalates in front of the disciplinary committee. So far at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
