[ad_1]
Seok-Yeol Yoon, Request for Stay of Execution the Day After Fall Rights Exclusion Order
The Seoul Administrative Court appoints an interrogation date at 11:00 on the 30th
As soon as possible, the result of the day … You can return to work if accepted
[앵커]
The hearing date for the request for stay of execution, which Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol presented to the court requesting that Minister Chu Mi-ae’s exclusion order be suspended, was set for the 30th. Two days later, the disciplinary committee is scheduled to be held, and before disciplinary action is decided, there is much interest in whether Yun can return to work. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung reports. Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol submitted a request for stay of execution to the court the following day after Minister of Justice Choo Mi-ae issued a request for disciplinary action and an order to stay the execution. Stay of enforcement is a court decision to temporarily stay enforcement of a disposition if there is concern about damage that is difficult to recover. He is usually filed with the main lawsuit, but President Yoon first filed a request for stay of execution and the court decided to proceed with an interrogation at 11:00 on the 30th. As soon as possible, the results will be released the same day and you can return to work as soon as your application is accepted. As Yoon rushed to respond to the legal actions, Minister Chu Mi-ae also sped up and set the deadline for disciplinary deliberation on the 2nd of next month, opening up the possibility of returning to work before then. However, even if President Yoon returns to work, the meaning of the stay of execution will disappear if the ‘dismissal’ is resolved in the deliberation of the disciplinary committee two days later. This is because the stay of execution literally only temporarily suspends the effect of the ‘stay of execution of work’, so if you are fired, you have no choice but to retire from your post. In the midst of this, another noise is raised by the celebration of the inspection commission of the Ministry of Justice. When the scheduled schedule was postponed after the disciplinary committee, some inspectors protested and requested a summons, and the schedule was withdrawn the day before to the disciplinary committee. The inspectors are reported to have complained that the Ministry of Justice changed the mandate to open the inspection in important matters to “optional”, as well as the view that the disciplinary claim against Yun was incorrect. Although the Ministry of Justice is not obliged to follow the recommendations of the Inspection, it will be burdensome if it has a dissenting voice. Furthermore, if the court accepts Mr. Yun’s request for stay of execution, it can act as a variable in deciding on the discipline of dismissal. The battle for leadership continues, but as it is observed that the disciplinary committee will eventually decide to remove Yun, a more fierce court battle is expected over the disciplinary outcome. YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN awaits your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
