[ad_1]
[앵커]
When Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae said he would hold a disciplinary committee against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol on the 2nd of next month without consulting the Inspection Committee, the inspectors are protesting. The inspectors requested that an emergency meeting be convened on the 1st of next month, before the disciplinary committee, and are waging a last-minute tug of war with the Ministry of Justice. Reporter Lim Seong-ho reports. The controversy began on the 3rd when the Ministry of Justice revised the surveillance regulations by surprise. It was changed to an option that required consultation with the Inspection Committee of the Ministry of Justice for the inspection of important matters. Subsequently, Minister Choo Mi-ae removed President Yoon Seok-yeol from his duties and attached him to the disciplinary procedure. It was decided to carry out the disciplinary commission on the 2nd of next month. Here, the inspectors protested. He said opening the disciplinary committee without consulting the prosecution would neutralize the prescribed procedure and asked the Ministry of Justice to hold an emergency meeting on the 1st of next month, the day before the disciplinary committee. It is known that the majority of the supervising commissioner announced their intention to attend the emergency meeting. When the convening of the impeachment commission before the disciplinary commission became clear, the Ministry of Justice took a position in Burjaburya and drew a line that it was considering whether to be held. It is not yet clear if the inspection committee will open on the first day of next month. In response, an inspector explained that he knows that the consultations drag on as the Ministry of Justice comes and goes about the date and place of the inspection committee. At the same time, he repeatedly emphasized that the inspection committee meeting schedule that members want is the first of next month, before the disciplinary committee. If an extraordinary meeting is held before the disciplinary committee, the inspectors can vote by majority vote to express a joint opinion on the prosecution process of Mr. Yoon and the disciplinary complaint of Minister Chu. Of course, this is not legally binding, so if Minister Chu does not accept it, it is enough. However, if the prosecution itself, which was the reason for Yun’s disciplinary action, is found to be illegal or unfair, the members of the prosecutor’s disciplinary committee will also bear a heavy burden in deciding the disciplinary action. This is YTN Seongho Lim. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
