[ad_1]
[앵커]
When Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol filed a constitutional petition again saying there was a problem with the procedure before the disciplinary committee scheduled for the 10th, Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae objected to the court decision he had stopped. his order to suspend his functions. Meanwhile, the controversy over the impartiality of the new Vice Justice Minister Lee Yong-gu, who will serve as the president’s disciplinary committee, has not disappeared. Connect reporters. Reporter Na Hye-in! Yesterday, President Yoon Suk-yeol filed a constitutional complaint saying there was a problem with the disciplinary process, but Minister Choo Mi-ae did not agree with the court’s decision to return to President Yoon’s office, right ? Yoon Seok-yeol, who previously responded to Minister Chu Mi-ae’s order to suspend his duties with an administrative complaint, filed a constitutional petition yesterday, saying that the disciplinary deliberation procedure was unconstitutional. The provisions of the Disciplinary Law of the Prosecutor, that the Minister of Justice who requested the disciplinary action for requesting the disciplinary action to appoint and commission the majority of the deliberative members, are contrary to the Constitution. In response, Minister Chu filed an immediate appeal against the Seoul Administrative Court’s decision to stop Yoon’s suspension from office. It means that I will be tried once again by the Seoul High Court, a higher court. However, even if an immediate appeal is made to the decision to stay the execution under the Administrative Procedure Act, the effect does not stop immediately, so Yun can continue to perform his duties until the court ruling returns. higher. Yoon’s side also filed a separate request for a temporary injunction requesting that Minister Chu nominate or appoint a committee member after the request for disciplinary action until a decision is made on the constitutional complaint. However, it is not clear if the results of the request for a temporary precautionary measure of suspension of effects judged by the Constitutional Court will also be concluded before the disciplinary commission, which is scheduled for 10 days, which takes longer than the usual case of suspension. judicial. In the midst of this, controversy over justice continues over the new Vice Minister of Justice Lee Yong-gu, who will serve as a member of President Yoon’s disciplinary committee. Yes, first yesterday, Vice Minister of Justice Lee Yong-gu, who attended the Legislative Judiciary Committee of the National Assembly, was caught having a group conversation via a mobile phone messaging telegram. Looking at the captured screen, Vice Minister Lee replied, “In general, when someone asked in the group chat room if President Yoon’s constitutional request would affect disciplinary deliberation, it was” a handshake chosen by the distrustful person. “ The controversy arose when the name of Detective Lee Jong-geun, an executive with the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, was picked up among fellow conversations. Criticism from inside and outside the prosecutor’s office that Vice Minister Yoon, a member of the disciplinary committee, is in consultation with the swordsman’s crime boss, the staff of the disciplinary party. On the date of the dispute, Vice Minister Lee and the Ministry of Justice explained that the account stored in the group room as ‘Jong-geun Lee 2’ belongs to the inspection of Judge Park Eun-jeong, the wife of General Manager Lee. Jong-geun. Let’s hear this deputy minister’s comment for yourself. Lee Jong-geun, the party manager, also jumped in saying that he was not the one who had a conversation with Vice Minister Lee Yong-gu in the group room. However, even if the other party is in charge of Park Eun-jung, criticism has not abated on whether it is appropriate for Vice Minister Lee to have a conversation with the person in charge of the investigation regarding President Yoon’s disciplinary deliberation. Also, in the middle of last month, Park Eun-jung investigated former Justice Minister Park Sang-sang in connection with Yoon’s suspicion, and the fact that he used the then-lawyer’s private office as a meeting place is a controversy every time. higher. So while talking to YTN, Vice Minister Lee explained that since last August, he had provided a room for former Minister Park Sang-sang to use as a private space. However, on President Yoon’s side, it is likely that Vice Minister Lee’s record as an attorney for former Commerce, Industry and Energy Minister Paik Woon-gyu in connection with the Wolseong nuclear power plant investigation is likely to be sought for evasion prior to disciplinary deliberation. Vice Minister Lee said that if President Yoon’s side requested evasion, the disciplinary committee would explain the relevant circumstances and that he would follow the procedure. So far, the Ministry of Social Affairs has handed it over. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
