[사회]Tomorrow Yoon Seok-yeol’s disciplinary committee …



[ad_1]

Tomorrow 10:30 a.m. M. Disciplinary Committee of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol
The temporary court order suspending the current constitution is difficult as a result of the disciplinary committee
4 additional witnesses, including the side of Yoon Seok-yeol, Lee Sung-yoon, and Han Dong-soo


[앵커]

The disciplinary committee against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol is approaching a day earlier.

The most controversial “judge inspector suspicion” is being followed by the nervous warfare of the Great Swordsman and the Ministry of Justice over the subject of the investigation.

I’ll connect the reporters. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung!

Now tomorrow, the Justice Ministry Prosecutor’s Discipline Committee will be held against President Yoon Suk-yeol, right?

[기자]

Tomorrow at 10:30 am, the Disciplinary Committee of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Ministry of Justice will deliberate on the disciplinary action against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol.

President Yoon Seok-yeol also filed a temporary injunction with the Constitutional Court to suspend its validity, but it seems difficult to get the results of the temporary injunction before the disciplinary committee.

The disciplinary committee is expected to proceed as scheduled, as the application of the provisional constitutional court order is actually considered the last variable in the disciplinary process.

Yesterday, President Yoon Seok-yeol requested four additional witnesses, including Seoul Central District Prosecutor Lee Seong-yoon, Supreme Prosecutor Han Dong-soo, Gwangju District Attorney General Deputy Prosecutor Jeong Jin-woong , and an anonymous prosecutor.

These are the people involved in the case of attempting to coerce a former Channel A reporter, or to interfere with the prosecution amidst the disciplinary charges of President Yoon Suk-yeol.

If you add up to 3 people, including Ryu Hyuk, an inspector from the Ministry of Justice who previously submitted the application, 7 people have come forward only as witnesses.

The disciplinary committee will decide tomorrow during the deliberation process whether or not to adopt a witness.

President Yoon’s request to evade the disciplinary committee is also expected to be made at the venue tomorrow.

General Yoon’s policy is that if prosecutors close to Minister Chu, including Vice Minister of Justice Yong-gu Yong-gu, are nominated as members of the disciplinary committee, they will request the impeachment immediately.

Accordingly, tomorrow the disciplinary committee will first decide whether or not to bypass the disciplinary committee, and witness adoption and cross-examination procedures will take place.

The rejection is determined by the majority attendance of those registered and the approval of the majority of the attendees, and those who have received a rejection request cannot participate in the resolution.

The hearing process begins in the morning, but is likely to last well into the afternoon.

If the process is prolonged, including the adoption of all the witnesses, there is the possibility that another hearing will be held.

It has not been decided yet whether Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol will be present or not.

Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae did not answer any questions on his way to work today asking his feelings before the disciplinary committee.

Let’s hear it.

[추미애 / 법무부 장관 : (내일 윤석열 총장 징계위 앞두고 한 말씀 부탁합니다) …….] [앵커]

In the midst of this, a nervous war between the Great Sword and the Ministry of Justice continued yesterday over the suspicion of a ‘judge’s inspection’, right?

[기자]

Yesterday morning, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office ordered the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office to investigate the suspicion of Yoon’s “Judge’s Inspection” being conducted by the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office.

The main reason was that it was difficult to expect a fair investigation as a result of the investigation by the office of the Human Rights Policy Officer that confirmed violations of due process during the investigation of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office.

Representatively, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office noted that the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Han Dong-soo obtained the court analysis documents through the Buddha statue channel, handed them over to the Ministry of Justice, and returned them as reference material. for research.

Likewise, it revealed that the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office was frequently informed of the progress in the seizure and search process of the Office of the Investigative Information Officer.

The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office assigned the case to the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office and sent the case of President Yoon’s “existential abuse charges”, requested by the Ministry of Justice, to the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office.

The fact-finding carried out by the Human Rights Policy Office is also carried out by the Seoul High Prosecutor’s Office, and all references to the investigation have been released.

Then the Ministry of Justice immediately expressed its regret.

After returning to the prosecutor’s office, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office intervened in the investigation through the Human Rights Policy Office and the investigation by prosecutors was stopped.

They also argued that the order of the Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office to assign the case to the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office was not different from that of the President.

I tried to refute it again, explaining in detail the antecedents of the great order of kendo.

The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office requested that a special prosecutor be appointed to ensure fairness, but the Ministry of Justice passively came out and inevitably assigned the case to the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office.

The position of the Ministry of Justice on the request for special prosecutors has not yet come out.

However, as there are observations that the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, may once again exercise investigative authority, the nervous war between the Justice Department and the Great Sword escalates in front of the disciplinary committee.

So far at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is.

※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr

[저작권자(c) YTN & YTN plus 무단전재 및 재배포 금지]
[ad_2]