[ad_1]
[앵커]
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae’s order for additional inspections from Lime to Optimus is actually interpreted as a direct target of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, and tensions are rising. There is also a movement of internal opposition to the accusation, and the chief prosecutor in charge, who was not indicted by the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office at the time, also published a lengthy rebuttal. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung reports. Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae produced an “inspection” card for Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, one after another, on the last day of the audit. First, he pointed to the allegations of a so-called ‘secret meeting’ in which he met with the CEO of Chosun Ilbo, such as Bang Sang-hun, even though there were related cases pending when Yoon was the head of the Central District Prosecutor’s Office. from Seoul. Subsequently, President Yoon served as the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office and mentioned the need for an inspection on suspicion that the Korea Radio Agency had dismissed the Optimus case requested by the Korea Radio Agency. In addition to the suspicion of an insolvent investigation, I heard the suspicion that there was a lobby due to a relationship with attorney Lee Gyu-cheol, who was in charge of the defense at the time. Earlier, Minister Chu, who ordered the inspection of opposition prosecutors and politicians for misconduct allegations over the Lime crisis, went one step further and this time pointed directly at Yun. A rebuttal was immediately published within the prosecution. At the time, Wonju Branch Commissioner Kim Yoo-cheol, who was in charge of the Optimus case, refuted the allegations in the allegations, saying that there was no problem with the disposition procedure. It was difficult for the client to invest large amounts of investigative power, stating that there was no problem as a result of his own investigation and the investigation of the Financial Supervision Service. At the time, it was revealed that it was identified as a civil complaint stemming from an internal dispute based on the fact that the complaint case with the same content was received and canceled at the Seoul Gangnam Police Station. Regarding the complaint procedure, he explained that it was a case of “prior determination of the manager”, so he did not report to District Attorney Seok-yeol Yoon at that time, and that it was not a violation of regulations. . President Yoon also drew a line on suspected lobbying, saying that he had no contact with attorney Lee Gyu-cheol, who was also part of Gukjeong Nongdan’s special prosecution team. So far, there has only been one order for the acting attorney general to be inspected, and when Chae Dong-wook was under the supervision of the ‘out-of-wedlock controversy’, he immediately removed his clothes. “The Great Sword is refraining from an official backlash, but as Minister Chu Mi-ae is interpreted to have in fact publicly urged President Yoon Suk-yeol to resign, the conflict between the Ministry of Justice and the Great Sword is headed for an instant. YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
