[ad_1]
[앵커]
The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office said that during the investigation of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office on the suspicion of ‘Judge’s Inspection’, the case was assigned to the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office. The Justice Ministry said that it was actually an order from President Yoon, and said it would respond, and the conflict between the two sides is escalating once again. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung reports. Supreme Prosecutor’s Office The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office for Human Rights Policy, which has been investigating whether there were violations in the process of investigating the suspicion of judicial inspection by the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, announced the findings. The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office for Human Rights Policy said that in the process of conducting an investigation by the Prosecutor’s Office, reasons were found to doubt the fairness and legitimacy. It was confirmed that the Chief of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, Han Dong-soo, who obtained the “court analysis document”, handed it over to the Ministry of Justice and returned it as reference material for the investigation. Subsequently, the Chief Prosecutor of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, under the direction of Director Dong-soo Han, did not follow the complaint system and, in fact, expressed President Yoon as a “lost statement” and arrested him as a suspect. It was also revealed that during the seizure and search of the Investigation Information Office, where the document was drawn up, the progress was frequently reported to officials of the Ministry of Justice. Section 3 of the Public Prosecutor’s Office belatedly learned of the process of obtaining Director Dong-soo Han’s documents and announced their intention to stop the investigation. General Yoon avoided command due to a conflict of interest, and Deputy Prosecutor Nam-gwan Cho, who was briefed on the investigation, assigned the case to the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office to ensure legitimacy and fairness. The case requested by Justice Minister Chu Miae was also assigned to the Seoul High Prosecutor’s Office and a fair investigation was ordered. Then the Ministry of Justice immediately raised the issue. The Justice Ministry said it is regrettable that the investigation by the Prosecutor’s Office was stopped by the command of the deputy attorney general, which is equivalent to that of the president. Furthermore, he added that it is difficult to expect a fair and full investigation of the case assigned to the Seoul High Prosecutor’s Office, adding that he would take the necessary action after receiving detailed reports. The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office tried to entrust the investigation to a special prosecutor for fairness, but he countered that the Ministry of Justice was passive and that if it approves it now, it will continue. Although the authority to investigate the related complaints has been transferred to the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office, the authority and the investigation procedure may change again depending on the action of the Ministry of Justice, which puts both parties on edge. YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
