[ad_1]
Meeting of Representatives of the National Judge at 10 am … Proceed to burn
125 national court judges debate current issues in the judiciary
To date, eight agendas have been proposed, including expanding the scope of the sentence.
If the voices of condemnation of the judges meet in the meeting,
If you come to the conclusion that it is difficult to see it as a temple, it seems empowering
[앵커]
The ordinary meeting of the representatives of the national judges, which is a meeting of the representatives of the national judges, is held since the morning. Before Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s disciplinary committee, one of the disciplinary action charges, suspicion of inspection by a judge, will be discussed as an agenda. I’ll connect the reporters. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung! At this time, is the Representative Meeting of National Judges underway? The ordinary meeting of the Meeting of Representatives of National Judges has started today at 10 am and the discussions are ongoing for almost two hours. The Meeting of the National Delegation of Judges has been held regularly twice a year, this time as a videoconference due to the impact of Corona 19. The National Meeting of Judges is a meeting in which representative judges from each level of the courts discuss current issues of the judiciary, and is made up of 125 representatives of the national courts. There are 8 agendas proposed so far. The expansion of the scope of the dissemination of the sentence, the improvement of the qualification of the work of the judges and the improvement of the planning and judicial control system will be discussed. However, any suspicion of a judge’s inspection can be proposed as a new agenda only if it is proposed as an agenda at the meeting location and the consent of nine other representatives is obtained. It has not yet been decided whether the agenda will be proposed. Opinions differ within the court. Beginning with Judge Chang Chang-guk Jang, Chief Judge of the Jeju District Court, Judge Song Gyeong-geun, Chief Law Judge of the Cheongju District, and Chief Judge Kim Seong-hoon of the Seoul Central District Law, etc., posted articles on the court’s internal network with opinions critical of the prosecution and urged discussion. On the other hand, it is a politically sensitive topic, centered on the Supreme Court justices and Gwangju District Judge Cha Ki-hyun and the voices that we must respond carefully. It is unknown if it will be addressed in the actual meeting and how the results will be achieved. If it is presented as an agenda at a meeting and the judges designate the document as an inspection, it will be used as the basis for disciplinary action against Yun in the disciplinary committee that will take place on the 10th. On the other hand, if it is concluded that it is inappropriate to be viewed as a temple, or if it is not even disputed at all, President Yoon Seok-yeol’s claim that it is one of the duties of keeping the bylaws can be fed. As if aware of this, President Yun’s side handed out a brochure collecting detailed information about federal judges in the United States to reporters, repeatedly emphasizing that foreign countries sell the judges’ information to litigate. Today’s meeting is expected to continue into the afternoon. Interest is focusing, as the results of the discussions in the delegation of the judiciary can be a big variable in the discipline of President Yoon. So far at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
