[ad_1]
The late prosecutor Kim Hong-young chooses to be an extremist with violent language and aggression
There is no progress in the investigation … Request to convene the family investigation deliberation committee
Meeting of the Citizen’s Committee on the Prosecutor’s Office … Convocation of the Investigation Deliberation Committee
[앵커]
In the case of the late prosecutor Kim Hong-young, who suffered abuse and abuse from his superiors and made an extreme decision, the outsiders decided to continue the investigation and whether to prosecute. A committee made up of ordinary citizens accepted the survivors’ request to open the ‘Prosecutor’s Investigation Review Committee’ through a meeting. Reporter Park Seo-kyung reports. In 2016, 33-year-old prosecutor Hong-young Kim, who was in his second year, made an extreme decision, unable to withstand the usual spiel and aggression from former chief prosecutor Kim Dae-hyun, his superior. At the time, former Chief Prosecutor Kim was removed from office without criminal penalties, and the investigation began with a late indictment, but was rarely advanced. In the end, the surviving family requested a summons from the Investigation Review Committee, saying that they would seek expert judgment outside of each field on whether to continue the prosecution or investigation. As a result of a meeting held by ordinary citizens randomly selected by the Citizens Committee of Prosecutors, it was decided that it was necessary to convene an investigative deliberation committee on the case of the late prosecutor Kim Hong-young. The Subsidiary Review Committee explained that a considerable amount of time has passed since the allegations and considered the need to draw attention to the incident of harassment in the workplace. When the Investigation Vice Committee fills out the Investigation and Deliberation Committee’s convening request and sends it to Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, President Yoon must start the summons procedure sooner or later. The grieving party confessed that the criminal sanction procedure was at the forefront of criminal sanctions, as was the case with the prosecution four years ago, and that it would not work properly if the public did not make an effort in it, and that it was heavy. He added that he believes that this decision is the result of the will of citizens that they cannot trust the prosecution. The prosecution’s investigation team said it respected the decision, but said it would conduct a thorough investigation in accordance with the rules and procedures, in addition to the convocation of the Investigation Review Committee. Previously, Samsung Electronics Vice President Lee Jae-yong’s suspicion of the illegal succession of management rights and attempts to force Channel A also attracted great attention when the Prosecutors’ Investigative Committee, made up of outside experts, decided whether to investigate and prosecute. However, there has been criticism that the prosecution has drawn different conclusions about the results of the Investigative Deliberation Committee and neutralized the system it introduced. The prosecution’s investigation was once again put to the test of external judgment if the case of the late prosecutor Kim Hong-young, which had not progressed much for more than a year, will face a new phase through the deliberation committee of the investigation. of the prosecution. This is YTN Park Seo-kyung. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
