[ad_1]
“Determination of disciplinary claims before the author of the document is verified”
“The Chief of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office gave documents to the prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa”
The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office investigates the seizure and seizure process.
[앵커]
Among the charges of disciplinary claims against President Yoon Suk-yeol, the most controversial is the ‘Suspected Judge Inspection Document’. As a result of the interview with YTN, it was confirmed that the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae, announced a disciplinary complaint without reporting the results of the investigation by the chief prosecutor in charge of the document. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung reports. Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae held an emergency briefing on the 24th of last month at around 6 pm. It was the moment when the disciplinary complaint against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and the exclusion from duties were announced. At around 5 p.m., before the plan was known, the prosecutor in charge of the Department of Justice, Park Eun-jung, ordered the prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa, who was sent to the prosecutor’s office, to investigate the alleged documents. of the judge’s inspection. Prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa, who received instructions, called investigative intelligence officer Son Jun-seong, Burjaburya’s chief prosecutor. The moment I heard a short statement on the phone was around 5:20 pm. It was already after Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae left for the Seoul Senior Prosecutor’s Office to inform him of President Yoon’s request for disciplinary action. Despite the fact that the author of the document was confirmed for the first time on this call, and even the details of the brief were not confirmed, Minister Chu decided to demand disciplinary action from President Yun and exclude his duties. In particular, when it became known that the first person to deliver the document to prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa was the chief prosecutor, Han Dong-soo, the suspicion arose that there was a prior relationship between the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office . The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office is already conducting an investigation after receiving a complaint that the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office has been commanded by the Ministry of Justice without informing the Director General in the seizure and registration process of the Information Officer of the Investigation Office for secure related data. Prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa, who submitted a series of investigations to the oversight committee in the form of affidavits, is said to have revealed his feelings that it appears that the conclusion has already been decided. The prosecutor also revealed that in the report he wrote on the internal network of the Prosecutor’s Office, the contents that the allegations of the judge’s inspection did not constitute a crime were deleted without explanation. Amid the controversy surrounding the ‘Judge’s Inspection Document’, whether the creation of the document is grounds for disciplinary action is expected to be the biggest issue in the disciplinary committee next week. YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
