[ad_1]
[앵커]
A war of nerves continues between the Ministry of Justice and the Supreme Swordsman over the suspicion of the judge’s inspection, which is the reason for the disciplinary complaint by Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. There are also observations that the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office opposes the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office and that the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, will exercise command of the investigation for the third time after taking office. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung reports. Deputy Prosecutor Cho Nam-gwan, the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, assigned both the suspicion of Yoon Seok-yeol’s ‘Judge’s Inspection’ and the case requested by the Ministry of Justice to the Seoul Superior Prosecutor’s Office. The reason was that it was difficult to expect an impartial investigation, as the prosecution confirmed a violation of due process during the investigation. In particular, the problem was that the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Han Dong-soo handed over the analysis document to the Ministry of Justice and returned it as a reference for the investigation. Inspector General Han Dong-soo, who is known not to respond to the investigation process of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office for Human Rights Policy, also posted strong criticism on social media, saying that the internal attack that neutralizes the inspection is felt even murderer. The Justice Ministry also immediately expressed its regret and announced a response. The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office requested the approval of a special prosecutor, but what is most prominently discussed is the initiation of the investigative command power by the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae. The Ministry of Justice stipulated that the command of the Deputy Prosecutor of the Supreme Swordsman was actually the order of the President, but it seems to take into account that the investigation and command of the Minister can only be done against the Attorney General. Furthermore, as emphasized in the case that the case was under the jurisdiction of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, not the Seoul High Prosecutor’s Office, there are observations that Minister Chu will order the assignment to the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office . However, as General Yoon has already avoided the case due to a conflict of interest, it may not seem appropriate to exercise command and, if so, to exercise command against the Deputy Attorney General of the Great Sword, controversy may arise. of legality. It is true that it would be burdensome to draw the same card again, since Minister Chu already held office twice and six cases after taking office. In particular, since President Yun’s disciplinary committee is imminent, there is a high possibility that Chu will make a decision after observing the results, so the specific topic and investigation method will be described after the disciplinary committee. YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]it is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN awaits your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
