[ad_1]
Chu Mi-ae, instructing the inspection … “Checking whether to investigate or not”
At the time, the central district attorney’s officer, Yoon Seok-yeol … practically addressed to the Attorney General
Public criticism of Minister Chu when publishing a publication on the internal network
Voices of ‘unreasonable inspection’ even among front-line prosecutors
[앵커]
The Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, ordered an inspection this time in the case of the former Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office regarding Optimus’ innocence. Since the attorney general at the time was attorney general Yoon Seok-yeol, it appears that he was actually targeting Yoon, and there are rebuttal voices within the prosecution. We will connect journalists to learn more. Reporter Kang Hee-kyung! First of all, what is the case of Optimus’ innocence that Minister Chu Mi-ae ordered inspection? Yes, the Korea Radio Agency requested the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office to investigate in October 2018, alleging that the funds invested in Optimus were used for the non-equity merger and acquisition of Sungji Construction. The Central District Prosecutor’s Office declared that the investment funds were used in the scope of the investment proposal in May of the following year, and that there was no damage to the Radio Agency. In the national audit, it was found that he was responsible for the huge fraud damages that occurred as the then Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who was then the district attorney, failed to investigate properly. Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae ordered the inspection immediately the day after the comprehensive state affairs audit. First, Minister Chu asked us to ensure that this was not a “lookalike” investigation from which all were removed without charge without a basic investigation. In addition, we order to investigate the suspicion of the case caused by the lobby of influential personnel such as the former attorney general. After the chief prosecutor in charge of the case was involved in the president’s hearing, he moved to the key position of chief prosecutor and, referring to the fact that attorney Gyu-cheol Lee, who was the attorney on the case, had a close relationship with the attorney general, he gave instructions to see if the case was reported to the attorney general at that time. The investigation was commissioned for a financial offense worth 68 billion won, but the investigation was also subject to disapproval due to a major case. What is the atmosphere inside the prosecution? Yes, Minister Chu’s indictment order appears to actually be directed at Yun, as the central district attorney was then Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. The Justice Ministry is responding cautiously, saying it ordered an inspection on a specific matter, not a specific person. There has only been one supervisory order for the incumbent attorney general, because at that time, when Chae Dong-wook was under supervision, the consequences were difficult, such as removing his clothes immediately. The great sword has yet to reveal its official position. However, even if it comes to inspecting a specific issue, the situation is being watched closely, as President Seok-Yeol Yoon, who was on the command line, can be brought up on the issue at any time. A stream of complaints is detected within the prosecution. This morning, the prosecutor published a post on the internal network of the prosecution publicly criticizing Minister Chu. Prosecutor Lee Hwan-woo of the Jeju District Prosecutor’s Office harshly criticized Chu, saying that human rights, command and oversight are being abused without hiding purpose and intent. “It seems clear that politicians have set a bad precedent to cover up the accusation,” said the justice minister, who said that legal and historical responsibility must be assumed. A prosecution official also said that there are many opinions in the phone call with YTN that they do not see it as an objective and reasonable inspection that meets the requirements to initiate the inspection. According to the results, the supervising commander also raised his voice and asked if he should be held responsible. Other executives criticized that it was not common sense to order the prosecution in a situation in which a detailed explanation was also given to the chief prosecutor in charge, and that the objective was obvious. There are voices of discontent among front-line prosecutors. The conflict between the Ministry of Justice and the Great Swordsman is intensifying as indictment orders are issued following the successive initiation of the investigation and the right of command directed at Yun. So far at the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, YTN Kang Hee-kyung[[email protected]]is. ※ ‘Your report becomes news’ YTN is waiting for your valuable report.
[카카오톡] Search YTN to add a channel [전화] 02-398-8585 [메일] [email protected] [온라인 제보] www.ytn.co.kr
